Will it ever be possible?
↧
Mapping Altered States of Consciousness
↧
Walter Russell’s Home Study Course (PDF)
You may be interested in reading the teachings of Walter Russell, a polymath and genius who lived between 1871 and 1963, whose comprehensive cosmology - a union of spirituality/metaphysics and science – is both simple and fantastic :
Walter Russell’s Home Study Course (48 parts or 12 units) Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Ref Mystical Wonders Discussion Group
Links for FREE downloading of the material :
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-1-lessons-1-2-3-4.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865273-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-1-lessons-1-2-3-4.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-2-lessons-5-6-7-8.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865397-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-2-lessons-5-6-7-8.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-3-lessons-9-10-11-12.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865444-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-3-lessons-9-10-11-12.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-4-lessons-13-14-15-16.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865499-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-4-lessons-13-14-15-16.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-5-lessons-17-18-19-20.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865954-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-5-lessons-17-18-19-20.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-6-lessons-21-22-23-24.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866177-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-6-lessons-21-22-23-24.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-7-lessons-25-26-27-28.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866238-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-7-lessons-25-26-27-28.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-8-lessons-29-30-31-32.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866286-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-8-lessons-29-30-31-32.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-9-lessons-33-34-35-36.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866382-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-9-lessons-33-34-35-36.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-10-lessons-37-38-39-40.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866420-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-10-lessons-37-38-39-40.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-11-lessons-41-42-43-44.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866464-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-11-lessons-41-42-43-44.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-12-lessons-45-46-47-48.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866588-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-12-lessons-45-46-47-48.pdf
Some information on Walter Russell :
http://www.walter-russell.de/en/Biographie.php
Russell and the New Age
The term New Age in its contemporary sense can be traced back at least to 1888. Walter Russell spoke of "... this New Age philosophy of the spiritual re-awakening of man ... Man's purpose in this New Age is to acquire more and more knowledge ..." in his essay "Power Through Knowledge," which was published in 1944.
Russell accepted Richard Maurice Bucke's premise that not only the human body, but also human consciousness, had evolved in stages, that human consciousness periodically made iterative leaps, such as that from animal awareness to rational self-awareness, many millennia ago. Russell believed that humankind was on the brink of making another key, evolutionary leap in consciousness. The next cycle of human evolution, said Bucke, would be from rational self-consciousness to spiritual super-consciousness on the order of that experienced by sages, religious figures, and mystics of the past 2,500 years.
In 1947–48, Russell wrote: “This New Age is marking the dawn of a new world-thought. That new thought is a new cosmic concept of the value of man to man. The whole world is discovering that all mankind is one and that the unity of man is real – not just an abstract idea. Mankind is beginning to discover that the hurt of any man hurts every man, and, conversely, the uplift of any man uplifts every man” (Message of the Divine Iliad, vol. 2, p. 69). Russell’s predictions about what the New Age would bring included “a marriage between religion and science” (MDI p 257). Russell appeared to believe that this "New Age" would begin in 1946, based on a vision he had in 1921.
The most extensive treatment of Russell's ideas are found in his book, “A Course in Cosmic Consciousness.” Russell's ideas have also been digested by others.
Walter Russell’s Home Study Course (48 parts or 12 units) Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Ref Mystical Wonders Discussion Group
Links for FREE downloading of the material :
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-1-lessons-1-2-3-4.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865273-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-1-lessons-1-2-3-4.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-2-lessons-5-6-7-8.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865397-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-2-lessons-5-6-7-8.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-3-lessons-9-10-11-12.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865444-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-3-lessons-9-10-11-12.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-4-lessons-13-14-15-16.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865499-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-4-lessons-13-14-15-16.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-5-lessons-17-18-19-20.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61865954-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-5-lessons-17-18-19-20.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-6-lessons-21-22-23-24.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866177-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-6-lessons-21-22-23-24.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-7-lessons-25-26-27-28.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866238-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-7-lessons-25-26-27-28.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-8-lessons-29-30-31-32.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866286-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-8-lessons-29-30-31-32.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-9-lessons-33-34-35-36.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866382-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-9-lessons-33-34-35-36.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-10-lessons-37-38-39-40.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866420-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-10-lessons-37-38-39-40.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-11-lessons-41-42-43-44.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866464-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-11-lessons-41-42-43-44.pdf
walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-12-lessons-45-46-47-48.pdf
http://www.apparentlyapparel.com/uploads/5/3/5/6/5356442/61866588-walter-russell-s-home-study-course-unit-12-lessons-45-46-47-48.pdf
Some information on Walter Russell :
http://www.walter-russell.de/en/Biographie.php
Russell and the New Age
The term New Age in its contemporary sense can be traced back at least to 1888. Walter Russell spoke of "... this New Age philosophy of the spiritual re-awakening of man ... Man's purpose in this New Age is to acquire more and more knowledge ..." in his essay "Power Through Knowledge," which was published in 1944.
Russell accepted Richard Maurice Bucke's premise that not only the human body, but also human consciousness, had evolved in stages, that human consciousness periodically made iterative leaps, such as that from animal awareness to rational self-awareness, many millennia ago. Russell believed that humankind was on the brink of making another key, evolutionary leap in consciousness. The next cycle of human evolution, said Bucke, would be from rational self-consciousness to spiritual super-consciousness on the order of that experienced by sages, religious figures, and mystics of the past 2,500 years.
In 1947–48, Russell wrote: “This New Age is marking the dawn of a new world-thought. That new thought is a new cosmic concept of the value of man to man. The whole world is discovering that all mankind is one and that the unity of man is real – not just an abstract idea. Mankind is beginning to discover that the hurt of any man hurts every man, and, conversely, the uplift of any man uplifts every man” (Message of the Divine Iliad, vol. 2, p. 69). Russell’s predictions about what the New Age would bring included “a marriage between religion and science” (MDI p 257). Russell appeared to believe that this "New Age" would begin in 1946, based on a vision he had in 1921.
The most extensive treatment of Russell's ideas are found in his book, “A Course in Cosmic Consciousness.” Russell's ideas have also been digested by others.
↧
↧
Every world in a grain of sand: John Nash’s astonishing geometry...
What is interesting about the late mathematician Nash is the origin of his ideas which would have direct relevance to this blog. The following comes from the article below but is "highlighted" here..as it is important to know...RS
"...As is well known from the movie, Nash came to believe in outlandish conspiracy theories involving aliens and supernatural beings, as a result of his schizophrenia. When later asked why he, an extremely intelligent scientist, could believe in such things, he said those ideas “came to me the same way that my mathematical ideas did. So I took them seriously”.And frankly, if my head told me ideas as accurate and as insightful as those needed to prove the isometric embedding theorem, I’d likely trust it on aliens and the supernatural too."
Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Image: Hevea Project
This article was written by Daniel Mathews from Monash University in Australia. The article was originally published by The Conversation.As has been widely reported, John Forbes Nash Jr died tragically in a car accident on May 23 of this year. Many tributes have been paid to this great mathematician, who was made famous by Sylvia Nasar’s biography A Beautiful Mind and the subsequent movie based on that book.
Much has been said about Nash’s work on game theory. But less has been said about Nash’s other mathematical achievements. Many mathematicians who understand Nash’s work would agree, I think, that although his work in game theory had the most impact on other fields, Nash made other breakthroughs which were even more impressive.Apart from game theory, Nash worked in fields as diverse as algebraic geometry, topology, partial differential equations and cryptography.But perhaps Nash’s most spectacular results were in geometry. To honour Nash’s life, I would like to try to give a flavour of some of this work.
Gotham3/imgurAs it turns out, even though a cylinder or a cone looks curved, it is intrinsically flat. In an undergraduate course on differential geometry (such as the one I teach at Monash), one studies this intrinsic curvature, and it turns out that there are lots of flat surfaces.
Richard Morris/WikipediaThese ideas were around for hundreds of years before Nash, but Nash took them much further.
Hevea ProjectMore pictures are available at the Project’s website.But the mathematical theorem doesn’t just apply to tennis balls or donuts: the theorem holds for any manifold of any dimension. Any world can be contained in a grain of sand.
John Nash and pure mathematics
A great deal of Nash’s work was in the field of geometry. But this kind of geometry - differential geometry - is very different from the geometry learned at high school. It is not about trigonometry or Pythagoras, as found in secondary maths textbooks. Rather, it is about topics like surfaces, curvature and smoothness.Like all pure mathematicians, Nash proved theorems: logical statements that are rigorous, precise and absolutely true, with no tolerance for vagueness. The world of pure mathematics is austere and often abstruse, but its claims to truth are eternal and absolute.Well, that’s the theory at least. Breakthroughs in pure mathematics are often at the very limits of human understanding. It takes time, even for those in the field, to fully comprehend new developments.Nash’s work was an extreme case. His papers could be chaotically presented, hard to follow and his approaches to problems were often unlike anything that had come before him, bamboozling students and experts alike. But he was almost otherworldly in his creativity.While mathematical arguments are tightly constrained by the rigorous requirements of logic, Nash’s constructions and methods were wild. And nowhere was this more so than in his work on geometry.Nash’s geometry
Take a flat sheet of paper. You can bend it, but without ripping it or creasing it, what shapes can you make? You can’t make a sphere, or even a section of a sphere, because a sphere is curved, while the paper is flat.But you can make a cylinder. And even a cone, as you’ll know if you’ve ever seen a dunce’s hat. (This fact is also useful for making waffle cones, as shown below.)

The embedding problem
Nash took up the idea of 'embedding' a surface: placing it into space without tearing, creasing or crossing itself. An embedding which does not distort the surface’s intrinsic geometry is 'isometric'. In other words, the surfaces above are 'isometric embeddings' of the plane into 3-dimensional space.The isometric embedding question can be asked not just for the plane, but for any possible surface: spheres, donuts (which mathematicians call tori to try to sound respectable) and many others.As it turns out, there are surfaces that are so strongly curved or tangled up that they cannot be embedded into 3-dimensional space at all. In fact, they can’t even be embedded into 4-dimensional space.But Nash showed that any surface can be embedded into 17-dimensional space. Extra dimensions, far from making the problem even more difficult, actually make it easier - giving you more room to embed your surface! Later on, Nash’s work was improved by others, and we now know that any surface can be embedded into 5-dimensional space.However, surfaces are only 2-dimensional. And Nash was interested in surfaces of any possible dimension. These higher dimensional analogues of surfaces are known as 'manifolds'.Nash proved that you can always embed a manifold into space of some dimension, without distorting its geometry. With this momentous result, he solved the isometric embedding problem.Nash’s proof of the isometric embedding problem came as a complete surprise to much of the mathematical community. His methods were revolutionary. The great mathematician Mikhail Gromov said that Nash’s work on the embedding problem struck him to be “as convincing as lifting oneself by the hair”. But after great effort, Gromov finally understood Nash’s proof: at the end of Nash’s lengthy argument, Gromov said, Nash “miraculously, did lift you in the air by the hair”!Isometric embedding in action
Gromov went on to develop his own ideas, inspired by Nash’s work. He wrote a book - similarly renowned among mathematicians for its incomprehensibility, just like Nash’s work - in which he developed a method called 'convex integration'.Gromov’s method had several advantages. One is that it is easier to draw pictures of an embedding made with his convex integration method. Prior to Gromov, we knew isometric embeddings existed, and had wonderful properties, but had a very tough time trying to visualise them, not least because they were often in higher dimensions.In 2012, a team of French mathematicians produced computer graphics of isometric embeddings using Gromov’s convex integration methods. They are extremely intricate, almost fractal-like, yet smooth. Some are shown below.The world in a grain of sand
Nash’s work on the isometric embedding problem has many facets and has led to huge amounts of subsequent research.One particularly amazing aspect is how isometric embeddings are constructed. Nash’s work, combined with subsequent work by Nicolaas Kuiper, showed that if you wanted to isometrically embed a surface in 3-dimensional space, it’s enough to be able to shrink it.If you have a 'shrunken' embedding of your surface - that is, with all lengths decreased - then Nash and Kuiper show how you can obtain an isometric embedding of your surface just by adjusting your shrunken version a bit.This sounds ridiculous. For instance, take a sphere - say the surface of a tennis ball - and imagine shrinking it down to have a nanometre radius. Nash and Kuiper show that by 'ruffling' the surface sufficiently (but always smoothly; no creasing or folding or ripping or tearing allowed!) you can have an isometric copy of your original tennis ball, all contained within this nanometre radius. This type of 'ruffling' of the surface was reproduced in the French team’s computer graphics.The French team considered taking a flat square piece of paper. Glue the top side to the bottom side, to get a cylinder. Now glue the left side to the right side. If you think about it, you might be able to see that you get a donut. But you’ll find the paper is now creased or distorted.Can you embed it into 3-dimensional space without distortion? Nash and Kuiper say “yes”. Gromov says “use convex integration”. And the French mathematicians say “this is what it looks like”!
How did he do it?
Nash had a rare combination of genius and hard work. In her biography of Nash, Sylvia Nasar details his formidable intensity and effort spent working on the problem.As is well known from the movie, Nash came to believe in outlandish conspiracy theories involving aliens and supernatural beings, as a result of his schizophrenia. When later asked why he, an extremely intelligent scientist, could believe in such things, he said those ideas “came to me the same way that my mathematical ideas did. So I took them seriously”.And frankly, if my head told me ideas as accurate and as insightful as those needed to prove the isometric embedding theorem, I’d likely trust it on aliens and the supernatural too.Daniel Mathews is Lecturer in Mathematics at Monash University.This article was originally published by The Conversation. Read the original article.↧
List of prizes for evidence of the paranormal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[show]Part of a series of articles on the paranormal |
---|
Objectives[edit]
The purpose of offering prizes for evidence of paranormal abilities is to publicly challenge those who claim to possess such abilities to demonstrate that they in fact possess them, and are not fraudulent or self-deceptive.[2] The paranormal challenges, often posed by groups or individuals who self-identify as "skeptics" or "rationalists", are mutually agreed upon beforehand between the challengers and the claimants. A challenge is usually divided into two steps, the first being a "preliminary test" or "pre-test", where claimants can show their purported abilities under controlled conditions before a small audience, before being admitted to the final test. Sometimes these pre-tests have a smaller prize attached to them.[3] Several local organisations have set up challenges that serve as pre-tests to larger prizes such as the JREF's One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge[1][4][5] or the 2012–2013 SKEPP Sisyphus Prize (for one million euros).[6][7]
History[edit]
In 1922, Scientific American made two US$2,500 offers: (1), for the first authentic spirit photograph made under test conditions, and (2), for the first psychic to produce a "visible psychic manifestation."Harry Houdini was a member of the investigating committee. The first medium to be tested was George Valiantine, who claimed that in his presence spirits would speak through a trumpet that floated around a darkened room. For the test, Valiantine was placed in a room, the lights were extinguished, but unbeknownst to him his chair had been rigged to light a signal in an adjoining room if he left his seat. Because the light signals were tripped during his performance, Valiantine did not collect the award.[2]Since then, many individuals and groups have offered similar monetary awards for proof of the paranormal in an observed setting.[2] Indian rationalist Abraham Kovoor's challenge in 1963 inspired American skeptic James Randi's prize in 1964,[8] that has since grown out to the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge. In 2003, these prizes were calculated to have a combined value of US$2,326,500.[9] As of January 2015[update], none of the prizes have been claimed.
Prizes[edit]
Date | Moderator(s) | Prize | Details | Unclaimed |
---|---|---|---|---|
1963–1978 | Abraham Kovoor (deceased 1978) | 100,000 LKR | (Approx $1500 USD as of 2015-01-03) Kovoor initiated the Abraham Kovoor's challenge starting in 1963. He inspired others like Randi and Premanand.[8] | Yes |
2000–present | Alfredo Barrago's Bet (CICAP) | €50,000 | (US$67,922 approx) "... shown at least a "phenomenon" produced by "medium, seers, sensitive etc." of paranormal nature."[10] | Yes |
1997–present | Asian Rationalist Society of Britain, Lavkesh Prasha | £10,000 | "[T]o any person who could prove to possess magical powers before the media and scientists." The initial amount of £2,000 was increased fivefold in 2006 to attract more applicants.[11][12] | Yes |
N/A 2012–2013 | Association for Skeptical Enquiry | £12,000 (N/A) £400 (2012–2013) | (Undated) For proof of psychic powers.[2] (US$600 approx in 2012–2013) Awarded to anyone who passed the British preliminary test to the Belgian Sisyphus Prize.[6] | Yes |
1980–present | Australian Skeptics | A$100,000 | (US$101,374 approx) For proof of the existence of extrasensory perception, telepathy, or telekinesis.[13] | Yes |
1976–present | Basava Premanand (deceased 2009), Indian Skeptic / Indian CSICOP | 100,000 INR | (US$2,190 approx) Offered after Abraham Kovoor fell ill with cancer in 1976.[14] Premanand's magazine and organisation have continued the challenge after his death in 2009.[15] | Yes |
2011–present | Daniel Zepeda | MX$20,000 | "To anyone who can show, under proper observational and replicable conditions, evidence of a paranormal, supernatural or occult power for which science has no answer."[16] | Yes |
2008–present 2012–2013 | Eesti Skeptik | €10,000 (2008–present) €500 (2012–2013) | (US$1300 approx) To anyone who can prove paranormal abilities.[17] Awarded to anyone who passed the Estonian preliminary test to the Belgian Sisyphus Prize.[18] | Yes |
2007–2009 | Eng. Sanad Rashed and Ahmed Khaled Tawfik | US$5,000 | For proof ouija boards function as claimed.[citation needed] | Yes |
N/A–present 2012–present | Fayetteville Freethinkers | US$5,000 (N/A–present) A house (2012–present) | "[F]or a demonstration of supernatural claims".[19] Since 2012, a house is offered to anyone who can catch a Bigfoot.[20] | Yes |
2008, 2014 | Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations, Narendra Nayak | 200,000 INR (2008) 1,000,000 INR (2014) | Correctly answer 21 out of 25 questions relating to future election results (intended for astrologers, but open to anyone).[21][22] | Yes |
1987–2002 | Gérard Majax, Henri Broch, Jacques Theodor | €200,000 | International Zetetic Challenge. Mediums and clairvoyants were challenged to show their powers, but all 275 candidates failed.[23] | Yes |
2004–present | Gesellschaft zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung von Parawissenschaften | €10,000 | (US$13,000 approx) To anyone who can prove paranormal abilities.[24][25] | Yes |
2000–present | Independent Investigations Group | US$100,000 | "[T]o anyone who can show, under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power or event." The person who refers a successful applicant to the IIG earns US$5,000.[26] Previously, the prize was US$50,000.[2][27] | Yes |
1995–present | Indian Rationalist Association, Sanal Edamaruku | 100,000 INR | To anyone who could prove the 1995 "Hindu milk miracle" was, in fact, a miracle.[28] Since 2002, it includes "anyone who can provide scientific evidence for iridology".[29] | Yes |
1964–present | JREFOne Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge | US$1,000,000 (since 1996) | Launched by James Randi as $1,000 in 1964,[30] raised to $10,000 by 1980,[31] to $100,000 by 1989,[32] and finally to a million in 1996.[33] Since the launch of the James Randi Educational Foundation, applications are processed and tests prepared and conducted by a committee.[30] | Yes |
N/A | Kazakhstan Commission for the Investigation of Anomalous Phenomena | US$1,000 | [citation needed] | Yes |
1996–present | Les Sceptiques du Quebec | CA$10,000 | (US$10,132 approx) "Just a small fact, observable or verifiable through experiment" of a paranormal phenomenon. Also serves as a preliminary test to the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge of the JREF. Originally, Les Sceptiques had their own separate prize of CA$750,000.[4] | Yes |
N/A | New York Area Skeptics | US$2,000 | Awarded to the successful completion of the JREF One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge.[citation needed] | Yes |
(At least since 2001[34]) | North Texas Skeptics | US$12,000 | "[T]o any person (...) who can demonstrate any psychic or paranormal power or ability under scientifically valid observing conditions."[2][35] | Yes |
1966–2005 | Philip J. Klass (deceased) | US$10,000 | For proof of an extraterrestrial visit to the Earth.[36] | Yes |
N/A | Raul Jaanson | €6,000 | (US$8,000 approx)[citation needed] | Yes |
1985–present | Science and Rationalists' Association of India, Prabir Ghosh | 2,500,000 INR | Prabir Ghosh will award the prize "to any person of this world who can demonstrate his/her supernormal power by performing any one of the following activities without taking help of any hoax/trick at my designated place and circumstances."[37] The initial amount was 2 million INR.[38] | Yes |
1922 | Scientific American | US$2,500 | Two US$2,500 offers: (1) for the first authentic spirit photograph made under test conditions, and (2) for the first psychic to produce a "visible psychic manifestation."[2] | Yes |
1999–present | Sima Nan | 1,000,000 CNY | (US$157,500 approx) "[T]o anyone who can perform one act of "special ability” without cheating."[39] Can be won in conjunction with the JREF One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge prize.[citation needed] | Yes |
2002–present | SKEPP Sisyphus Prize | €10,000 (2002–2012) €1,000,000 (2012–2013) €25,000 (2013–present) | The original Sisyphus Prize was €10,000. For the duration of one year, 1 October 2012 until 30 September 2013, an anonymous Antwerp businessman raised the prize €1,000,000, while several European skeptical organisations attached their pre-tests to it.[7][40] Afterwards, the regular Sisyphus Prize was continued and raised from €10,000 to €25,000.[3] | Yes |
1989–present | Skepsis ry (Finnish Association of Skeptics) | €10,000 | (US$13,584 approx) For anybody in Finland who can produce paranormal phenomena under satisfactory observing conditions or prove that she/he/it is an extraterrestrial by providing a DNA (or equivalent) sample for investigation. Money partially from astronomer Hannu Karttunen and magician Iiro Seppänen.[41] | Yes |
2012–present | Sri Lankan Rationalist Association | 1,000,000 LKR | (US$7,675 approx) Professor Carlo Fonseka renewed Abraham Kovoor's challenge.[42] | Yes |
1988–present | Stichting Skepsis | €10,000 | To anyone who wants their "alternative diagnoses" (including kinesiology, electroacupuncture, bioresonance therapy, Therapeutic Touch, observing auras, clairvoyance, iridology, pendulum dowsing, astrology) to be tested; winning the pre-test earns €500.[43] Skepsis' first challenge in March 1988 was ƒ10,000 to any "psychic surgeon" who could remove chairman Cornelis de Jager's appendix.[44] | Yes |
1994–present | Stuart Landsborough (New Zealand Skeptics) | NZ$100,000 | (US$75,000 approx) "[T]o anyone who could prove by psychic ability that they can indicate the exact location" of two halves of a promissory note hidden within an area of 100 metres inside Stuart Landsborough's Puzzling World. Over the years, the search area has been reduced from 5 kilometres to 100 metres and the prize doubled, but the note split in two to reduce the chance of winning by sheer luck.[45] Contestants have to donate NZ$1,000 to charity if they fail.[46] | Yes |
N/A | Swedish Humanist Association | 100,000 SEK | (US$15,421 approx) To anyone who can demonstrate a paranormal or supernatural ability for which no scientific explanation can be found.[47] | Yes |
1989–present | Tampa Bay Skeptics | US$1,000 | "[T]o anyone able to demonstrate any paranormal phenomenon under mutually agreed-upon observing conditions."[2][48] | Yes |
1984[citation needed] | Tarksheel Society | 1 crore (10 million) INR | (US$162,032 approx) To anyone who can perform any of 22 specified "miracles". The entry fee is 10,000 INR.[49] In 2012, 1 crore INR was also offered to anyone who could correctly predict the election results in five Indian state assemblies.[50] | Yes |
2014–present | Český klub skeptiků Sisyfos | 1,000,000 CZK | To anyone who can prove to possess paranormal abilities in areas such as clairvoyance, telepathy, telekinesis, rhabdomancy, etc.[51] | Yes |
See also[edit]
Further reading[edit]
- Christopher, Milbourne (1975), Mediums, Mystics & the Occult. Thomas Y. Crowell Co.
- (Dutch)Nanninga, Rob (1988), Parariteiten - een kritische blik op het paranormale. Het Spectrum.
- Radin, Dean (2006), Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality. Paraview Pocket Books.
References[edit]
- ^ Jump up to: abRichard Saunders (6 September 2012). "The Million Dollar Challenge at TAM 2012". JREF Swift Blog. James Randi Educational Foundation. Retrieved 8 January 2015.
- ^ Jump up to: abcdefghRobert Todd Carroll (19 June 2014). "Randi $1,000,000 paranormal challenge". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"Sisyphus prijs". SKEPP website (in Dutch). SKEPP. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"Défi sceptique : bourses de 10 000 $ et un million de dollars américains" (in French). Les Sceptiques de Québec. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Corinna Sachs (12 October 2004). "Übersinnliche Phänomene im Test"(PDF). Quarks & Co (in German) (WDR). Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"The Sisyphus Prize Pre-Test. Rules for applicants to ASKE". ASKE website. Association for Skeptical Enquiry. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- ^ Jump up to: abJoep Engels (30 September 2012). "Win een miljoen met het lezen van tarotkaarten". Trouw (in Dutch). Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"Abraham Kovoor". Thought & Action. Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Larsen, Claus (September 2003). "Get Rich Quick or Save the World". Skeptic Report. Archived from the original on 23 March 2007. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
- Jump up ^"Telefono Antiplagio". Antiplagio.org. 2000. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Indo-Asian News Service (7 December 2005). "NRI group gets cracking on Asian occultists in Britain". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Indo-Asian News Service (14 January 2006). "Asian rationalists in UK dare tantriks". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"The $100,000 Challenge". AS website. Australian Skeptics. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Basava Premanand (15 October 1998). "The Challenge". Indian Skeptic website. Indian CSICOP. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Basava Premanand (29 August 1998). "Rules for the Paranormal Challenge". Indian Skeptic website. Indian CSICOP. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Daniel Zepeda (17 August 2011). "Reto Paranormal de Papá Escéptico" (in Spanish). Papá Escéptico. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Martin Vällik (16 March 2008). "10000 €". skeptik.ee (in Estonian). Eesti Skeptik. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Martin Vällik (1 October 2012). "1 miljon eurot, kasvõi nõiavitsaga pildamise eest". skeptik.ee (in Estonian). Eesti Skeptik. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"About the Fayetteville Freethinkers". Fayetteville Freethinkers. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"A local group is offering a big reward". Global Broadcast Database. 18 April 2012.
- Jump up ^Jeevan Mathew Kurian (13 June 2008). "He beats holy men at their own game". Thaindian News (Indo-Asian News Service). Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"‘Astrologers biggest losers in 2014 Elections’--Humanists". The Siasat Daily. 21 June 2014. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"Z comme zététique, ou le pourfendeur du paranormal" (in French). Agence France-Presse. 8 September 2006.
- Jump up ^Nestler, Ralf (21 August 2009). "Die Macht der Strahlen". Zeit Wissen (in German) (Zeitverlag Gerd Bucerius) 5. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"Eine kurze Geschichte der GWUP" (in German). GWUP website. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"The IIG $100,000 Challenge". IIG website. Independent Investigations Group. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^ANP/AFP (30 May 2012). "Ghostbusters: is Hollywood a spiritual 'vortex'?". Radio Netherlands Worldwide. Retrieved 4 January 2015..
- Jump up ^Chris Lefkow (22 September 1995). ""Milk Miracle" -- or "Mass Hysteria"?". The Nepal Digest archive (Agence France-Presse). Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Lewis Wolpert (22 March 2002). "Science: a magical show of scepticism". The Independent.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"The Million Dollar Challenge". Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Timothy Ferris (23 November 1980). "Nonfiction in brief". The New York Times.
- Jump up ^"Are you psychic?". St. Petersburg Times. 2 April 1989.
- Jump up ^Wendy Grossman (9 December 1996). "Science: Putting psychics to the test. An arch-sceptic is offering $1m in a challenge to belief in the paranormal, writes Wendy Grossman". The Independent. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"Challenge Activity". NTS website. North Texas Skeptics. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Gregory H. Aicklen, John F. Blanton, Prasad N. Golla, Mike Selby, John A. Thomas. "The North Texas Skeptics Paranormal Challenge". NTS website. North Texas Skeptics. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Klass, Philip J. (1975). UFOs Explained. New York: Random House. pp. 355–359. ISBN 9780394492155. OCLC 979190.
- Jump up ^Prabir Ghosh (22 June 2010). "Challenge to all ‘supernatural’ and ‘paranormal’ power holders/ astrologers etc". SRAI website. Science and Rationalists' Association of India. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Andrew Marshall (12 December 1998). "For my next trick...". The Sydney Morning Herald.
- Jump up ^Mainfort, Donald (March 1999). "Sima Nan: Fighting Qigong Pseudoscience in China". Skeptical Inquirer (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry) 9 (1). Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Jan Bosteels (3 July 2013). "Hoe meet je iets dat niet bestaat? SKEPP voert eerste test van 1 miljoen uit". Knack (in Dutch). Retrieved 6 January 2014.
- Jump up ^"Skepsis in English". Skepsis website. Skepsis ry. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Padma Rao Sundarji (27 November 2014). "What is it with us and scandalous Swamis?". The Daily Mirror. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Rob Nanninga& Jan Willem Nienhuys. "Alternatieve diagnoses kunnen op de proef worden gesteld". Skepsis website (in Dutch). Stichting Skepsis. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
- Jump up ^Paalman, Jan (September 1988). "Psychochirurgie. Opereren met blote handen". Skepter (in Dutch) (Stichting Skepsis) 1 (3): 28.
- Jump up ^Stuart Landsborough. "What is the Psychic Challenge?". Stuart Landsborough's $100,000 Psychic Challenge. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Stuart Landsborough. "Rules of the Challenge". Stuart Landsborough's $100,000 Psychic Challenge. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"Kristallkulan". SHA website (in Swedish). Swedish Humanist Association. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"$$$ Challenges". TBS website. Tampa Bay Skeptics. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"Our Challenge – Win Rupees 1 Crore". Tarksheel Society. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
- Jump up ^Neel Kamal (20 February 2012). "Assembly elections: Predict winners and win Rs 1 crore!". The Times of India. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
- Jump up ^"Paranormální výzva". Falešní hráči (in Czech). The Real Bohemian. 2014. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
|
↧
List of skeptical organizations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia/Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
This is a list organizations that promote or practice scientific skepticism.
Name (English / local (abbreviation)) | Founded | Region served | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Argentinian Skeptical Circle / Círculo Escéptico Argentino[1] (CEA) | 2010 | ![]() | |
Association against Quackery / Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij (VtdK) | 1881 | ![]() | Oldest skeptical organisation.[2] Member of ECSO.[citation needed] |
Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) | 1997 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Australian Skeptics | 1980 | ![]() | |
Bihar Rationalist Society / Bihar Buddhiwadi Samaj (BRS) | 1985 | ![]() | Member of FIRA. |
Brazilian Society of Skeptics and Rationalists / Sociedade Brasileira de Céticos e Racionalistas (SBCR) | 2001 | ![]() | |
Center for Inquiry (CFI) | 1991 | ![]() | Global umbrella organisation based in Amherst, New York. |
Committee for the Advancement of Scientific Skepticism (CASS) | 2010 | ![]() | Part of Centre for Inquiry Canada.[4] |
Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), formerly Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) | 1976 | ![]() | Part of the Center for Inquiry. |
Committee Para / Comité Para[5] | 1949 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] Serves Wallonia and Brussels. |
Commission of Fight with Pseudoscience and Falsification of Scientific Research / Комиссия по борьбе с лженаукой и фальсификацией научных исследований | 1999 | ![]() | Organized by RAS or RAN (not to be confused with RANS or RAEN). |
Czech Skeptics Club Sisyfos / Český klub skeptiků Sisyfos (Sisyfos) | 1995 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Dakshina Kannada Rationalist Association / தட்சிண கன்னட பகுத்தறிவாளர் ஒன்றியம் (DKRA) | 1976 | ![]() | Member of FIRA. |
Edinburgh Skeptics Society (EdSkeptics) | 2009 | ![]() | |
European Council of Skeptical Organisations (ECSO) | 1994 | ![]() | European umbrella organisation, based in Roßdorf, Germany. |
Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations / இந்திய பகுத்தறிவாளர் ஒன்றியங்களின் பேரவை (FIRA) | 1997 | ![]() | Indian umbrella organisation. |
Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) | 1978 | ![]() | Focuses on state/church separation, nontheism, and atheism. |
French Association for Scientific Information / Association française pour l’information scientifique (AFIS) | 1968[6] | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Glasgow Skeptics | 2009 | ![]() | |
Good Thinking Society | 2012 | ![]() | |
Het Denkgelag | 2012 | ![]() | |
Hungarian Skeptic Society / Szkeptikus Társaság (HSS) | 2006 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Independent Investigations Group (IIG) | 2000 | ![]() | |
Indian CSICOP | 19?? | ![]() | Affiliated with CSI, member of FIRA. |
Indian Rationalist Association (IRA) | 1949 | ![]() | Member of Rationalist International. |
Irish Skeptics Society | 2002 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Italian Committee for the Investigation of Claims of the Pseudosciences / Comitato Italiano per il Controllo delle Affermazioni sulle Pseudoscienze (CICAP) | 1989 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) | 1996 | ![]() | |
Maharashtra Committee for Eradication of Blind Faith / Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti (MANS) | 1989 | ![]() | Member of FIRA. |
Merseyside Skeptics Society (MSS) | 2009 | ![]() | |
MTÜ Eesti Skeptik (skeptik.ee) | 2007 | ![]() | |
National Capital Area Skeptics (NCAS) | 1987 | ![]() | Serves Washington metropolitan area. |
Network of Independent Danish Skeptics[3][7][8][9] / Skeptica | 1997 | ![]() | |
New England Skeptical Society (NESS) | 1996 | ![]() | Fusion of three earlier organisations. |
New Zealand Skeptics[10] (NZ Skeptics) | 1986 | ![]() | |
Nirmukta | 2008 | ![]() | |
Philippine Atheists and Agnostics Society (PATAS) | 2011 | ![]() | |
Polish Sceptics Club / Klub Sceptyków Polskich (KSP)[11][12] | 2010 | ![]() | |
Portuguese Skeptical Community / Comunidade Céptica Portuguesa (COMCEPT) | 2012 | ![]() | |
Rational Alternative to Pseudoscience - Society for the Advancement of Critical Thinking / Alternativa Racional a las Pseudociencias - Sociedad para el Avance del Pensamiento Crítico[13] (ARP-SAPC) | 1986 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science (RDFRS) | 2006 | ![]() ![]() | The American and British branches are independent. |
Round Earth Society / Sociedade da Terra Redonda (STR) | 1999 | ![]() | |
Science and Popular Enlightenment / Föreningen Vetenskap och Folkbildning (VoF) | 1982 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Science and Rationalists' Association of India / Bharatiya Bigyan O Yuktibadi Samiti | 1985 | ![]() | Based in Kolkata, West Bengal. |
SKEPP[14] | 1990 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] Serves Flanders and Brussels. |
Skepsis ry | 1987 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Skepsis Foundation / Stichting Skepsis (Skepsis) | 1987 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Skepsis Norway / Skepsis Norge (Skepsis)[15] | [citation needed] | ![]() | |
Skeptical Association of Chile / Asociación Escéptica de Chile (AECH) | 2010 | ![]() | |
Skeptical Circle / Círculo Escéptico (CE) | 2006 | ![]() | Member of ECSO.[3] |
Skeptic Society / Общество скептиков[16] | 2013[17] | ![]() | |
Society for the Scientific Investigation of Parasciences / Gesellschaft zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung von Parawissenschaften (GWUP) | 1987 | ![]() | Based in Roßdorf, Germany. Member of ECSO.[3] |
Swiss Skeptics – Association for Critical Thinking / Skeptiker Schweiz – Verein für kritisches Denken (Skeptiker) | 2012 | ![]() | |
The Skeptics Society | 1992 | ![]() | Globally active, but mainly serves California |
Young Australian Skeptics (YAS) | 2008 | ![]() | |
Zetetic Observatory / Observatoire Zététique (OZ) | 2003[18] | ![]() | Based in Grenoble, France. Member of ECSO.[3] |
See also[edit]
- Humanism
- Lists about skepticism
- List of books about skepticism
- List of secularist organizations
- List of skeptical conferences
- List of skeptical magazines
- List of skeptical podcasts
- List of notable skeptics
- Rationalism
References[edit]
- Jump up ^Círculo Escéptico Argentino website
- Jump up ^Andy Lewis (3 August 2009). "Dutch Sceptics Have ‘Bogus’ Libel Decision Overturned On Human Rights Grounds". The Quackometer. Retrieved 16 May 2014.
- ^ Jump up to: abcdefghijklmnop"Skeptics Organisations: ECSO Members". ECSO website. European Council of Skeptical Organisations. 16 March 2008. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Jump up ^History of CASS
- Jump up ^Its full name, Comité Belge pour l'Investigation Scientifique des Phénomènes Réputés Paranormaux ("Belgian Committee for Scientific Investigation of Purported Paranormal Phenomena"), is rarely used, except to indicate it inspired the name of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) three decades later.
- Jump up ^Jean-Pierre Thomas. "Notre histoire". Website AFIS (in French). AFIS. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
- Jump up ^Skeptica website
- Jump up ^Also translated as Association of Independent Danish Skeptics by ECSO and CSI.
- Jump up ^CSI – Association of Independent Danish Skeptics
- Jump up ^The full name is "New Zealand Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal", but this name is rarely used in practice.
- Jump up ^Tomasz Witkowski & Maciej Zatonski (18 November 2011). "The Inception of the Polish Sceptics Club". CSI website. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- Jump up ^KSP website
- Jump up ^ARP-SAPC website
- Jump up ^The letters 'SKEPP' stand for Studiekring voor de Kritische Evaluatie van Pseudowetenschap en het Paranormale ("Study Circle for the Critical Evaluation of Pseudoscience and the Paranormal"), but in practice only the abbreviation is used.
- Jump up ^(Norwegian)Skepsis Norge
- Jump up ^Saunders, Richard (23 March 2014). "The Skeptic Zone #283 - 23.March.2014". The Skeptic Zone. Episode 283. Australian Skeptics. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Jump up ^Алфёров, Кирилл (April 2014). "Выпуск 041". "Скептик" podcast. Общество скептиков. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
- Jump up ^"FAQ". OZ website. Observatoire Zététique. Retrieved 27 March 2015.
External links[edit]
- CSI – International Network of Skeptical Organizations
- Somewhere To Think– Introduction portal to several thought-provoking groups around Australia and New Zealand
|
|
↧
↧
Harvard Neurosurgeon Confirms The Afterlife Exists
By Steven Bancarz| Do we have a soul? Is there life after death? The afterlife is something that has been experienced by countless people since recorded history who have returned to tell their tales, with the most noteworthy account experienced first-hand by Harvard trained brain neurosurgeon of 25 years, Dr. Eben Alexander. This is not just another afterlife account that can be written off as a hallucination. Before we look at exactly how his experience of the afterlife defies all scientific explanation, lets explore his account a little bit.
Before his experience, he did not believe existence of a non-physical spirit. Trained in western medical school and surrounded by medical colleagues who are deeply invested in the materialism view of the universe, he thought that the idea of a soul was outlandish. Like most “skeptics”, he believed stories of the afterlife to be hallucinations or products of the human imagination.Dr. Alexander changed his mind after he was in a coma for seven days caused by severe bacterial meningitis. During his coma he experienced a vivid journey into what he knew to be the afterlife, visiting both heavenly and not so heavenly realms.
After returning to his body and experiencing a miraculous healing against all odds, and went on to write the NY Times #1 best selling book “Proof of Heaven.” What Dr. Alexander confirms is that our life here is just a test help our souls evolve and grow, and that the way we succeed in doing so is to proceed with love and compassion. Here are just a few other notable points he made:

– The experience of the afterlife was so “real” and expansive that the experience of living as a human on Earth seemed like an artificial dream by comparison.
– The fabric of the afterlife was pure LOVE. Love dominated the afterlife to such a huge degree that the overall presence of evil was infinitesimally small. If you wish to know the Universe, know Love.
– In the afterlife, all communication was telepathic. There was no need for spoken words, nor even any separation between the self and everything else happening around you. All the questions you asked in your mind were immediately answered to you telepathically as well.

When asked what he wants everyone to know about the spiritual realm, he always answers saying that you are precious and infinitely loved more than you can possibly imagine. You are always safe. You are never alone. The unconditional and perfect Love of God neglects not one soul.
“Love is, without a doubt, the basis of everything. Not some abstract, hard-to-fathom kind of love but the day-to-day kind that everyone knows-the kind of love we feel when we look at our spouse and our children, or even our animals. In its purest and most powerful form, this love is not jealous or selfish, but unconditional.
This is the reality of realities, the incomprehensibly glorious truth of truths that lives and breathes at the core of everything that exists or will ever exist, and no remotely accurate understanding of who and what we are can be achieved by anyone who does not know it, and embody it in all of their actions.”
Now let’s talk credibility for a minute. What makes this experience so much more significant than another NDE account? Eben’s neocortex was completely nonfunctional during the time of his coma do to his severe bacterial meningitis, so there is no scientific account for why he experienced this. In fact, he gives refutations to 9 different possible scientific explanations for his experience in his book.

Exploring Naturalistic Explanations
Let’s take a look at 5 potential explanations he outlines in Appendix B of “Proof of Heaven”. Some are of his explanations would make no sense to us as laymen untrained in neuroscientific terminology, so here are the most common explanations he refutes, all of which are taken verbatim from his book:1.A primitive brainstem program to ease terminal pain and suffering (“evolutionary argument” – possibly as a remnant of feigned-death strategies from lower mammals?). This did not explain the robust, richly interactive nature of the recollections.
2.The distorted recall of memories from deeper parts of the limbic system (for example, the lateral amygdala) that have enough overlying brain to be relatively protected from the meningitic inflammation, which occurs mainly at the brain’s surface. This did not explain the robust, richly interactive nature of the recollections.
3. DMT dump. DMT, a naturally occurring serotonin agonist causes vivid hallucinations and a dream-like state. I am personally familiar with drug experiences related to serotonin agonist/antagonists (LSD) from my teen years in the early 70s. I have had no personal experience with DMT but have seen patients under its influence. The rich ultra-reality would still require fairly intact auditory and visual neocortex as target regions in which to generate such a rich audiovisual experience as I had in a coma. Prolonged coma due to bacterial meningitis had badly damaged my neocortex, which is where all of the serotonin from the raphe nuclei in my brainstem (or DMT, a serotonin agonist) would have had effects on visual/auditory experiences. But my cortex was off, and the DMT would have no place in the brain to act.

4. A reboot phenomenon – a random dump of bizarre dis-jointed memories due to old memories in the damaged neocortex, which might occur on restarting the cortex into consciousness after a prolonged system-wide failure, as in my diffuse meningitis. Especially given the intricacies of my elaborate recollections, this seems most unlikely.
5. Unusual memory generation through an archaic visual pathway through the midbrain, prominently used in birds but only rarely identifiable in humans. It can be demonstrated in humans who are cortically blind, due to occipital cortex. It provided no clue as to the ultra-reality I witnessed and failed to explain the auditory-visual interleaving.
His NDE account stands as the most credible account of all time, and coming from his materialistic scientific background, we have good reason to believe that he really did have a vivid encounter with something beyond this world.
Here is an interview/feature he did with ABC News about his condition and his experience:

Sources: New York Times
Proof of Heaven by Dr. Eben Alexander
↧
Cheating the Ferryman:A new Paradigm of Existence
Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundatio.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
......Many of my recent FB Friends may not be aware of how the whole "Cheating the Ferryman" bandwagon first started. Well although my critics will not like this, it all started with a peer-reviewed academic paper which appeared in the IANDS Journal of Near-Death Studies. It was published with the help of Professor Bruce Greyson of the University of Virginia. To read it, and/or download a free copy please follow the link below. Also please feel free to "share" thus link on your own FB Wall or distribute the pdf to your own friends and associates. My position is not as hard-line materialist as it was fifteen years ago but the central concept still holds true for me ...
https://www.academia.edu/…/Cheating_the_Ferryman_A_New_Para…
↧
Theoretical Physics Backs Survival
By Ronald Pearson/ Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Overwhelming experimental evidence for survival of bodily death, amounting to total proof, already exists. This has been generated by both mental and physical mediumship, as concisely described by Victor Zammit(1) in his book, "A LAWYER PRESENTS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE AFTERLIFE". He draws his information from a wide range of literature and this is only one of thousands of books written on the subject. For example, James Webster(2), a member of the inner magic circle and one time stage magician, is a more recent author who would be most difficult to deceive by trickery. He includes his own personal experiences to supplement reports from famous scientists such as Sir William Crookes, Sir Oliver Lodge and John Logie Baird. What ought to provide a real clincher, however, is the evidence given by a team, including scientists and Webster, in the "Scole Report" published by the Society for Psychical Research(3) in 1999. This is surely proof that mediumship, inclusive of physical effects impossible to replicate by us, can be genuine.
Unfortunately mainline physicists all refuse to recognise the validity of such observations. They are clearly attempting to protect their paradigm that life, based only on matter we can explore by our instruments, is all that exists. To them consciousness is generated by the interaction of neurones in the brain and nothing else so that when the brain dies everything blacks out. This is clearly in total contradiction to the evidence supplied by mediumship and so something needs to be done to resolve the issues raised. It must be obvious to all that theoretical physics is the main stumbling block: it is unable, at the present time, to accommodate spiritual aspects within its framework. Until it can do so most scientists will continue to avoid looking at all this accumulated evidence: indeed they will continue to discredit and debunk this evidence whenever circumstances force them into confrontation.
All Theories Must Match Experiments
No theory can, by itself, prove anything: the proof comes from experiment and observation. Theories make sense of the experiments and show how apparently unrelated phenomena are aspects of the same thing. Good theories provide unification. For example, magnetism and electricity were separate fields when science was in its infancy. As understanding grew it was found that magnetic effects could be produced by electric currents and a moving magnet could cause a current to flow in a loop of wire. Now we speak of electromagnetism as a single force: one of the four forces of nature. Theoretical physicists hope ultimately to join these by a unified field theory arising from a single "superforce". Science, however, cannot progress by theory alone: it requires a synthesis of theory and experiment. When observation runs ahead of theory to provide anomalies which seem inexplicable, then as history has shown by repeating itself over and over, the anomalies are avoided, ignored or discredited in order to maintain the status quo: to avoid the need to injure existing intellectual vested interests. This, however, underlines the importance of making advances in theoretical physics. Until it can permit paranormal phenomena to exist, by unifying them as part of its framework, no amount of further evidence for survival will make the slightest difference: it will be simply ignored like all the rest.
This is where a new approach comes in and, it is hoped, will provide the key needed to switch existing paradigms. This could then permit acceptance of the evidence.
The Invention of the Big-Bang
My study began in 1984 after looking into the basic principles of the "Big-Bang" theory of Cosmology Physics. This had a huge explosive creation produced from an "intrinsic negative pressure of the vacuum". It breaks the rules of common-sense logic for any negative pressure to produce an explosion: such effects can only cause implosions! Further study showed up an alarming number of flaws in the basic logic. This logic is still accepted as if the theory was sound, even though it makes false predictions such as the "Cosmological constant" - a force pushing the galaxies apart which is 50 orders of magnitude greater than astronomical observations can allow! It arises because the theoreticians can find no way of turning off the Big-Bang they have invented.
Could the whole thing be completely wrong I asked myself. At the time I was a sceptic like most other scientists and had no intention of supporting the idea of survival. However, this appeared automatically as a spin-off within the solution.
Relativity Incompatible with Quantum Theory
Further study showed that attractive forces, like gravitation or the strong nuclear force, were being modelled using assumptions which violated a basic law of physics called the "conservation of momentum", which meant that a complementary form of substance had to exist at a sub-quantum level whose responses to applied forces had to be opposite those of matter. This complementary substance had to exist as primary particles made of negative energy. They complemented "primaries" made of positive energy, the whole existing as a balanced mixture. Unfortunately such a background medium was incompatible with the idea of "curved spacetime": the basis of Einstein's theory of general relativity. However, an incompatibility also existed between Einstein's relativity theories and quantum theory. The former relates generally to motions of matter on the large cosmic scale whilst quantum theory deals with the small scale: mostly motions of the components of atoms. (This incompatibility was admitted later by Professor Stephen Hawking in his popularisation, "A Brief History of Time").
Fully Compatible With Quantum Theory
The new approach, detailed in this author's book(4), showed that the basis of his own discipline, Newtonian physics, was also not being used in an exact way. The "inertial mass" of any object needed to include the equivalent of its energy of motion, "kinetic energy". Then it turned out that a sub-quantum level of reality had to exist to produce forces on matter and that this had to behave as a compressible fluid. Like air, it was most compressed the closer it was to a massive object like a planet or a sun. These two effects, when quantified by mathematics, paralleled all the predictions that were previously thought to be unique achievements of both special and general relativity: the theories that made Einstein so famous. Indeed almost every end equation that could be checked experimentally was identical to that derived from special or general relativity. The big difference, however, was that the new approach was not only fully compatible with quantum theory, it enhanced that theory.
A Paradox-free Alternative to the Big-Bang
Quantum theory as it stands is based on abstract "quantum waves" which double as sub-atomic particles. There is nothing in the theory that even attempts to say how these waves arise or even suggests what they are made from. These defects are now rectified as a consequence of a self-organising structure appearing at the sub-quantum level of reality (whose very existence is denied by relativity theory). It arises as a consequence of this level being a composite of the two complementary energies mentioned earlier and having the form of primary particles. It is shown that, in order to satisfy two basic conservation laws of physics, those of energy and momentum, that these particles actually breed by collision: so creating a paradox-free alternative to the Big-Bang as the primary creative force. The problem of the cosmological constant is resolved by its replacement with an ever-accelerating expansion caused by a net creation existing everywhere at all times. This fits in nicely with a recent observation made in 1998 and which still puzzles cosmologists: the expansion of the universe is accelerating instead of slowing down as they supposed.
Survival as a Fundamental Part of Physics
The mechanics of the process is shown, in the author's second publication(5), to result in a structure with similarities to the neural network of our brains. This arose in space, right to the very edges of the universe, together with its own built in power supply everywhere. The mathematics threw up a structure of interconnected switches which would naturally generate waves in a similar way to those traversing our brains. The structure is of immensely finer scale than our brains of matter but, more speculatively, it appears to have the same potential to develop both a machine-like intelligence and ultimately a primary consciousness. All it could do, however, is to control its waves. It seems reasonable to equate these with the quantum waves that are then used deliberately to create matter. Focused waves produce density spikes and these would behave like particles to us: so providing a unique explanation of the enigma called "wave particle duality". This is a basic feature of quantum theory but now providing a solution to a puzzle not previously resolved.
If true a "supermind of space" could create a whole set of matter-systems all co-existing in the same space but tuned to different quantum-wave frequencies. Then fragments of the supermind structure, the "sub-minds", could only tune into one matter-system at a time. Consequently the only reality apparent at any one time would be the one to which a sub-mind is temporarily tuned. When that matter-system became outworn, this sub-mind, being part of the structured sub-quantum fluid, would simply tune into one of the remaining matter-systems and continue to survive. On this basis our brains could well be mere interfacing mechanisms needed to enable the real minds to pilot the body. No justification can exist any longer in postulating that, of necessity, consciousness vanishes on brain death.
At least a mix of firm mathematical prediction and the speculation based upon it shows, in this way, that the link between survival and theoretical physics cannot be dismissed as impossible. Further detail is given in the peer-reviewed publication by this author(6), which also shows how the same waves produce the long range density gradients on which the new "quantum-wave theory of gravity" depends. Hence a further indication that this approach could be the one which is correct, is that now gravitation becomes integrated with the other forces of nature: something that the established approach has so far failed to achieve.
Now, however, nearly all aspects of the paranormal, inclusive of survival, are seen as potentially real effects. Theoreticians are therefore no longer justified in their attempt to explain these away. Nor can they be justified any longer in resorting to any other kind of subterfuge for their discreditment. Instead a way is provided for physics to be revitalised and reformed to accept survival as a fact which in no way conflicts with its basic principles.
It is worth noting, at this stage, that this new, "enlightened theoretical physics" is not equivalent to "dualism". The dualist idea is God outside of spacetime who organises matter. Physicists balk at accepting something outside the scope of their discipline. The new solution advanced, however, arises from physics itself and is inseparable from physics.
Now, as soon as this theory can become published and criticised the better. All criticism is welcome except for the destructive kind. The kind which simply ignores the logic presented and, to quote one typical example of a phrase used by an assessor for its dismissal, "relativity has withstood the test of time". This is simply not true when its admitted incompatibility with quantum theory is considered. I do not think anybody will find any basic flaw in the logic or any inconsistency with experimental observation. Then, if I am correct, this theory could become scientifically acceptable. If this happens, or anybody else produces an equivalent theory, then the accumulated evidence of survival will become accepted as a fundamental part of physics. No longer will the controversy survive, and the conflict between creationists and evolutionists will come to an end. The universe was deliberately created by the supermind of space so that biological systems could evolve.
References
1. | Zammit, Dr. Victor: "A LAWYER PRESENTS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE AFTERLIFE" Website: www.victorzammit.com |
2. | Books by James Webster James Webster's web site: www.mrjameswebster.co.uk |
3. | Keen, M., Ellison, A., & Fontana, Prof. D. : "The Scole Report". Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research Vol. 58, Part 220. November 1999. SPR, 49 Marloes Road, London W8 6LA |
4. | Pearson, R.D. "Intelligence Behind The Universe". ISBN 0 947823 21 2. Publications by Ron Pearson |
5. | Publications by Ron Pearson |
6. | Pearson, R.D. 'Consciousness as a Sub-Quantum Phenomenon'. Peer-refereed and published in the journal 'Frontier Perspectives': Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. Vol. 6 No. 2 Spring/Summer, 1997. ISSN: 1062-4767 |
Ref. 4 & 5 are written for the intelligent non-scientist but each has a mathematical supplement which should be understandable to anyone with school sixth-form mathematics. |
The above comes from the following site
The Campaign for Philosophical Freedom
The secular scientific case for survival after death
↧
Four Worlds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia/ Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
General Worlds in Kabbalah |
---|
![]() |
The concept of "Worlds" denotes the emanation of creative lifeforce from the Ein Sof Divine Infinite, through progressive, innumerable tzimtzumim (concealments/veilings/condensations). As such, God is described as the "Most Hidden of All Hidden",[1] and Olam is etymologically related to, and sometimes spelled as,[2]עלם (Noun: העלם Helem meaning "concealment"). While these dimmings form innumerable differentiated spiritual levels, each a particular World/Realm, nonetheless, through the mediation of the sephirot (Divine attributes), five Comprehensive Worlds emerge. "Higher" realms metaphorically denote greater revelation of the Divine Ohr light, in more open proximity to their source, "Lower" realms are capable of receiving only lesser creative flow. The Worlds are garments of the Ein Sof, and Hasidic thought interprets their reality as only apparent to Creation, while "from above" the Divine Infinite fills all equally.
As particular sephirot dominate in each realm, so the primordial fifth World, Adam Kadmon, is often excluded for its transcendence, and the four subsequent Worlds are usually referred to. Their names are read out from Isaiah 43:7, "Every one that is called by My name and for My glory (Atzilut"Emanation/Close"), I have created (Beriah"Creation"), I have formed (Yetzirah"Formation"), even I have made (Asiyah"Action"). Below Asiyah, the lowest spiritual World, is Asiyah-Gashmi ("Physical Asiyah"), our Physical Universe, which enclothes its last two sephirot emanations (Yesod and Malchut).[3] Collectively, the Four Worlds are also referred to as ABiYA, after their initial letters. As well as the functional role each World has in the process of Creation, they also embody dimensions of consciousness within human experience.
Contents
[hide]Enumeration[edit]
Part of a series on |
Kabbalah |
---|
![]() |
See also: Seder Hishtalshelut
The Worlds are formed by the Ohr Mimalei Kol Olmin, the Divine creative light that "Fills all Worlds" immanently, according to their particular spiritual capacity to receive. The 10 sephirot attributes and 12 basic partzufim personas shine in each world (though not yet manifestly in Adam Kadmon), as well as more specific Divine manifestations. In Lurianic Kabbalah, the partzufim dynamically interact with each other, and sublime levels are enclothed within lower existences, as their concealed soul. Nonetheless, in each World, particular sephirot and partzufim predominate. The Five Worlds in descending order:- Adam Kadmon (A"K, אָדָם קַדְמוֹן) meaning Primordial Man. The anthropomorphic metaphor"Adam" denotes the Yosher (Upright) configuration of the sephirot in the form of Man, though not yet manifest. "Kadmon" signifies "primary of all primaries", the first pristine emanation, still united with the Ein Sof. Adam Kadmon is the realm of Keter Elyon (Supernal Crown of Will), "the lucid and luminous light" (Tzachtzachot), "the pure lucid sephirot which are concealed and hidden" in potential. Containing the future emergence of Creation, it is Divine light with no vessels, the manifestation of the specific Divine plan for Existence, within Creation (after the Tzimtzum in Lurianic Kabbalah). In Lurianism, the lights from A"K precipitate Tohu and Tikun. As Keter is elevated above the sephirot, so Adam Kadmon is supreme above the Worlds, and generally only Four Worlds are referred to.
- Atziluth (אֲצִילוּת), meaning World of Emanation, also "Close." On this level the light of the Ein Sof (Infinite Divine "without end") radiates and is still united with its source. This supernal revelation therefore precludes the souls and Divine emanations in Atzilus from sensing their own existence. In Atzilus the 10 sephirot emerge in revelation, with Chochma (Wisdom) dominating, all is nullification of essence (Bittul HaEtzem) to Divinity, not considered created and separate. The last sephirah Malchut (Kingdom) is the "Divine speech" of Genesis 1, through which lower Worlds are sustained.
- Beri'ah (בְּרִיאָה or alternatively[4]בְּרִיָּה), meaning World of Creation. On this level is the first concept of creatio ex nihilo (Yesh miAyin), however without yet shape or form, as the creations of Beriah sense their own existence, though in nullification of being (Bittul HaMetzius) to Divinity. Beriah is the realm of the "Divine Throne", denoting the sephirot configuration of Atzilus descending into Beriah like a King on a Throne. The sephirah Binah (Understanding) predominates, Divine intellect. Also called the "Higher Garden of Eden". The Highest Ranking Angels are in Beriah.[citation needed]
- Yetzirah (יְצִירָה), meaning World of Formation. On this level the created being assumes shape and form. The emotional sephirot Chesed to Yesod predominate, the souls and angels of Yetzirah worship through Divine emotion and striving, as they sense their distance from the Understanding of Beriah. This ascent and descent channels the Divine vitality down through the Worlds, furthering the Divine purpose. Therefore, in Yetzirah are the main angels, such as Seraphim, denoting their burning consummation in Divine emotion. Also called the "Lower Garden of Eden".
- Assiah (עֲשִׂיָּה), meaning World of Action. On this level the creation is complete, differentiated and particular, due to the concealment and diminution of the Divine vitality. However, it is still on a spiritual level. The angels of Asiyah function on the active level, as the sephirah Malchut (fulfilment in Kingship) predominates. Below spiritual Asiyah is Asiyah Gashmi ("Physical Asiyah"), the final, lowest realm of existence, our material Universe with all its creations. The last two sephirot of Asiyah channel the lifeforce into Physical Asiyah.
Meaning[edit]

Jacob's vision in Genesis 28:12 of a ladder between Heaven and Earth. In Kabbalistic interpretation, the Sulam-ladder's four main divisions are the Four Worlds[5] and the angelic hierarchy embody external dimensions of the lights-vessels, while souls embody inner dimensions
The 16th-century systemisation of Kabbalah by Moshe Cordovero brought the preceding interpretations and schools into their first complete rational synthesis. Subsequent doctrines of Kabbalah from Isaac Luria, describe an initial Tzimtzum (withdrawal of the universal Divine consciousness that preceded Creation) to "allow room" for created beings on lower levels of consciousness. Lower levels of consciousness require the self-perception of independent existence, by the created beings on each level, to prevent their loss of identity before the magnificence of God. This illusion increases with more force in each subsequent descending realm. The number of graduations between the Infinite and the finite, is likewise infinite, and arises from innumerable, progressively strong concealments of the Divine light. Nonetheless, the four worlds represent fundamental categories of Divine consciousness from each other, which delineates their four descriptions. Consequently, each world also psychologically represents a spiritual rung of ascent in human consciousness, as it approaches the Divine.
Kabbalah distinguishes between two types of Divine light that emanate through the 10 Sephirot (Divine emanations) from the Infinite (Ein Sof), to create or affect reality. The continual flow of an immanent lower light ("Mimalei Kol Olmin"), the light that "fills all worlds" is the creating force in each descending world that itself continually brings into being from nothing, everything in that level of existence. It is this light that undergoes the concealments and contractions as it descends downward to create the next level, and adapts itself to the capacity of each created being on each level. A transcendent higher light ("Sovev Kol Olmin"), the light that "surrounds all worlds" would be the manifestation on a particular level of a higher light above the capacity of that realm to contain. This is ultimately rooted in the infinite light ("Ohr Ein Sof") that preceded Creation, the Tzimtzum and the Sephirot, rather than the source of the immanent light in the "Kav" (first emanation of creation after the Tzimtzum), in the teachings of Isaac Luria. Consequently, all the worlds are dependent for their continual existence on the flow of Divinity they constantly receive from the Divine Will to create them. Creation is continuous. The faculty of Divine Will is represented in the Sephirot (10 Divine emanations) by the first, supra-conscious Sephirah of "Keter"-Crown, that transcends the lower 9 Sephirot of conscious intellect and emotion. Once the Divine Will is manifest, then it actualises Creation through Divine Intellect, and "subsequently" Divine Emotion, until it results in action. The reference to temporal cause and effect is itself a metaphor. The psychology of man also reflects the "Divine psychology" of the Sephirot, as "Man is created in the image of God" (Genesis 1:27). In man the activation of willpower through intellect and emotion until deed, requires time and subsequent cause and effect. In the Divine Sephirot and their activation of Creation, this does not apply, as limitations only apply to Creation.
The Book of Job states that "from my flesh I see God". In Kabbalah and Hasidism this is understood to refer to the correspondence between the "Divine psychology" of the Four Worlds and the Sephirot, with human psychology and the Sephirot in the soul of man. From understanding the Kabbalistic description of the human soul, we can grasp the meaning of the Divine scheme. Ultimately, this is seen as the reason that God chose to emanate His Divinity through the 10 Sephirot, and chose to create the corresponding chain of four Worlds (called the "Seder hishtalshelus"-"order of development"). He could have chosen to bridge the infinite gap between the Ein Sof and our World by a leap of Divine decree. Instead the Sephirot and Four Worlds allow man to understand Divinity through Divine manifestation, by understanding himself. The verse in Genesis of this correspondence also describes the feminine half of Creation: (Genesis 1:27) "So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him, male and female created He them". Consequently some of the Sephirot are feminine, and the Shechina (immanent Divine presence) is seen as feminine. It is the intimate relationship between the Divine sceme of four World and man, that allows man's ascent more easily to Divine consciousness (see Dveikus).
Correspondences[edit]
World: | Descriptions: | Dominant Sephirah: | Letter of Tetragrammaton: | Level of soul: | Level of Torah-PaRDeS: | Other associations: |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adam Kadmon "Primordial Man" | Primary form of Kav Above consciousness Sephirot concealed Latent potential Tetragrammatons United with Ein Sof Divine intent Pure light, no vessels | Keter-Crown In relation to 4 Worlds Inherent Will to Create Revealed in Keter-Will of Atzilut | Apex atop י Yud Above representation Alluded to by thorn | Yechidah-Singular Essence of soul Unity with God | Sod Sh'b'Sod Secret within Secret Reflects Atzmut-Essence Inner soul of Torah Yechidah-source of Torah | Beyond all names Including all names Beyond good-bad polarity |
Atziluth "Emanation/Nearness" | From Tohu to Tikun Sephirot revealed First perception Unrestricted illumination Divine insight No self-awareness Nullification of Essence Divine All | Chochmah-Wisdom Source of intellect Partzuf of Abba-Father | י Yud Dimensionless point First illumination-Male Dot in the Palace | Chayah-Living Encompassing soul Spiritual awareness | Sod-Secret Kabbalah Soul of Torah Chayah-Wisdom of Torah | Concealed World with Beriah Divine name ע״ב Divine good Ayin-Nothingness Torah scroll Ta'amim-Notes |
Beri'ah "Creation" | Formless existence First self-awareness Parsah-Veil from Atzilut to Beriah Divine Intellect Nullification of Being First sensed Creation Divine Throne Higher Garden of Eden | Binah-Understanding Grasp of intellect Partzuf of Imma-Mother | Higher ה Hei Dimensional expansion Vessel for intellect-Female Palace | Neshamah-Breath Divine intellect in soul Highest internalised potential Breath is internalised | Drush-Homiletic Midrash Neshamah-Understanding of Torah Aggadah alludes to Kabbalah | Divine name ס״ג Mostly good Little potential source of bad Thought garment Torah scroll Nekudot-Vowels |
Yetzirah "Formation" | General existence Divine Emotions Striving for ascent Awareness of distance Active self-nullification Archetypal forms Lower Garden of Eden | Midot-6 Emotions Chesed to Yesod Centred round Tiferet Partzuf of Zeir Anpin-Son | ו Vav Descending illumination Emotional revelation-Male Reveals Da'at-Knowledge | Ruach-Spirit Divine emotions in soul Potential internalised spirit Emotional movement | Remez-Hint Ruach-Emotions of Torah Soul of simple meaning Some Torah commentaries | Revealed World with Asiyah Divine name מ״ה Equal good-bad potential Speech garment Torah scroll Tagin-Crowns |
Assiah "Action" | Particular existence Divine action Concealment of God 1 Asiyah Ruchni-Spiritual Below it: 2 Asiyah Gashmi-Physical Purpose of Creation | Malchut-Kingship Fulfilment in action Partzuf of Nukvah-Daughter Shechinah-Divine Presence | Lower ה Hei Dimensional expansion Vessel for emotions-Female Nurtures action | Nefesh-Lifeforce Vitality of actions Invested in body | Pshat-Simple Nefesh-Physicality of Torah Halachah and Torah narratives | Divine name ב״ן Mostly bad-little good Action garment Torah scroll Otiyot-Letters |
Photo gallery[edit]
- Ezekiel's Tomb in Iraq. Ezekiel's vision of the Divine Merkabah-Chariot,[6] and Isaiah's vision of the Kisei HaKavod-Throne of Glory,[7] are related in Kabbalah to beholding the Four Worlds from Yetzirah, and from Beriah
See also[edit]
Concepts:- Ohr
- Sephirot
- Ayin and Yesh
- Seder Hishtalshelut
- Anthropomorphism in Kabbalah
- Jewish angelic hierarchy
- Merkabah
References[edit]
- Jump up ^Tikunei Zohar, Introduction:17a
- Jump up ^Such as in Exodus 3:15, Ecclesiastes 3:11. Cited in Mystical Concepts in Chassidism, Jacob Immanuel Schochet, Kehot (Also as Appendix in English Likutei Amarim Tanya). Chapter 4, footnote 10. The association of Olam and Helem is often referred to in Kabbalah and Hasidism
- Jump up ^Rectifying the State of Israel, Yitzchak Ginsburgh, Gal Einai. Glossary: entry World
- Jump up ^http://www.ohalah.org/seidenberg/1pagehagga.pdf
- Jump up ^Cited in, for example, HaSulam commentary on the Zohar by Rabbi Yehuda Ashlag in the 20th century
- Jump up ^Book of Ezekiel 1:4-26
- Jump up ^Book of Isaiah 6:1–3
External links[edit]
- The Worlds: The Stages of the Creative Process from God's Infinite Light to Our Physical World from www.inner.org. Describes the many levels and Partzufim between Adam Kadmon and Atzilut, as well as prior stages, and then the subsequent Four Worlds
↧
↧
Category:Kabbalistic words and phrases
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia/ Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Subcategories
This category has the following 5 subcategories, out of 5 total.A
F
J
Q
S
Pages in category "Kabbalistic words and phrases"
The following 78 pages are in this category, out of 78 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more).A
T
↧
"Visionary" Kabbalistic Art Listing

![]() | Return to New Kabbalah Home Page (Article Source for T&Vs blog) Meditational Kabbalah Art Gallery. Contemporary artist Avraham Loewenthal's "Tzfat Gallery of Mystical Art." Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_ScienceTo what extent, is "visionary" Kabbalistic Art based on the imagination, or on "genuine" inner experience? RS/Blogger Art Inspired by Science and Kabbalah http://www.art.net/TheGallery/Vision/Yael Avi-Yonah and Dov Lederberg are two married artists, living and working in Jerusalem over three decades and create original paintings inspired by Kabbalah teachings & meditations. They make frequent exhibitions to the States, their next tour being to the Greater NYC & Boston areas May-June 2005. Please contact them by email: vision@art.net or phone: 972-2-5618303 for details. They also are happy to invite visitors to The Gallery of Nachson of Hebron. Jewish mystical and visionary art from "Nachshon of Hebron." I am told that Nachshon was blessed by the Lubavitcher Rebbe many years ago "to effect the tikun of the world of painting." He has presented many unique visions and ideas through his beautiful and profoundly detailed paintings. Avraham Levitt on the Kabbalistic Significance of the Internet. An interesting work in progress. The Art of Siona Benjamin. Fascinating artwork from Ms. Benjamin, a Sephardic Jew who was raised in Course Outline for "Jewish Mysticism." Prof. Eliezer Siegel's detailed and colorful outline regarding all phases of Jewish mystical thought. The Ten Sefirot of the Kabbalah Direct link to Eliezer Segal's colorful site describing each of the Sefirot. Cherub Press: Catalog 2000 Academic Publisher of Studies and Editions of Jewish Mystical Literature. Breslov Judaism With Heart Well-anotated and detailed selections from the writings of the Hasidic master, Nachman of Breslov. Franz Kafka and Jewish Mysticism Discusses Jewish mystical themes and possible Kabbalistic influences on Kafka's writings. Dissertations on Kabbalah. From Contentville.com. Provides abstracts and opportunity to purchase English and foreign language dissertations on "Kabbalah." Dissertations on "Jewish Mysticism". From Contentville.com. Provides abstracts and opportunity to purchase English and foreign language dissertations on "Jewish Mysticism." Chabad-Chasidism A discussion of Chasidic history, personalities and philosophy from the perspective of the contemporary Chabad (Lubavitch) movement. Adeena Karasick. Kabbalistically inspired poetry and essays. Shalom Center Website. Jewish renewal and the practice of Tikkun ha-Olam in relation to contemporary communal and political life. Aleph: Alliance for Jewish Renewal. Includes much material applying Kabbalistic ideas to the contemporary world from a progressive Jewish point of view. Kabbalah: The Way of the Jewish Mystic. A large selection of Kabbalah links of varied interest and quality. Kabbalah, D.Paul/Small. Gallery of Kabbalistically inspired contemporary art. Sefer Yetzirah. The Text of Sefer Yetzirah with selections from the commentary by Saadia Gaon (10th century). Leo Baeck on Sefer Yetzirah.. Interesting and controversial work in which Baeck relates ideas in this proto-Kabbalistic work to Proclus' Neoplatonism. Ascent Study and Recreation Center. Jewish hostel in the city of James Grotstein's Paper. Discussion of Wilfred Bion's mystical concepts in psychoanalysis, with references to Ein-Sof. As I discuss in Kabbalistic Metaphors, Bion is an important figure for those interested in the relationship between Kabbalah and psychoanalysis. Janet Zweig, "Ars Combinatoria". Mystical Systems, Procedural Art, and the Computer. Discusses combinatorial systems, beginning with that of Sefer Yetzirah, in connection with modern art, music, etc. James Hillman Website. As I have pointed out in my essay "The Depth of the Soul: James Hillman's Vision of Psychology (see "Jung and the Kabballah" in this website)," Hillman's archetypal psychology has much to offer those interested in constructing a "New Kabbalah," relevant to the contemporary world. The Lurianic Kabbalah is treated in detail in Sanford Drob's Symbols of the Kabbalah and Kabbalistic Metaphors. If you entered this site via a search engine, and there are no "flash contents" on the left hand side of your screen, the site will function better if you click here and go directly to www.newkabbalah.com and follow the instructions at the bottom of your screen to either enter the site or load Flash 4, if you do not already have it. All material on New Kabbalah website (c) Sanford L. Drob, 2001. The Lurianic Kabbalah |
↧
The Mystical Vision of Kabbalah
|
↧
Near-Death Experiences of the Hollywood Rich and Famous
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|Return to Home Page | |
↧
↧
Parapsychology on "Rational" Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search /Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Parapsychology is the supposedly scientific study of paranormal phenomena involving the human mind. This includes such things as psychokinesis, clairvoyance, and telepathy.
The goal is to apply the rigors of the scientific method and the advancements learned in studying the human mind learned in psychology to the world of the paranormal. In practice most of the experiments are of very poor quality design. They use poor controls (if any at all), usually have small sample sizes, ill defined terms and procedures, and rarely apply the concepts of double-blind studies.
And remember, just because it's called parapsychology, it has nothing to do with psychology. Some critics of psychology don't understand that.
Psi has never been demonstrated to exist.[3] Parapsychologists have admitted it is impossible to eliminate the possibility of non-paranormal causes in their experiments. There is no independent method to indicate the presence or absence of psi.[4] According to a scientific investigation (Moulton and Kosslyn, 2008):
Parapsychologists such as Dean Radin and Charles Tart have written that psi is real, that it is non-physical in basis and that is does not operate by known scientific laws but despite this still claim that psi has been proven by science in repeatable experiments and refuse to classify psi as metaphysical. How can non-physical psi that does not operate by known scientific laws be tested by empirical science via physical experimentation and testing? This contradiction has been noted.
Most parapsychologists are in agreement that psi is non-physical but no accepted theory of parapsychology currently exists and many competing and often conflicting models have been advocated by different parapsychologists in an attempt to explain reported paranormal phenomena. On this issue, Terence Hines in his book Pseudoscience and the Paranormal (2003) wrote "Many theories have been proposed by parapsychologists to explain how psi takes place. To skeptics, such theory building seems premature, as the phenomena to be explained by the theories have yet to be demonstrated convincingly."[8]
The philosopher Raimo Tuomela summarized why much of parapsychology is considered a pseudoscience in his essay "Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience".[9]
In a review of parapsychological reports Ray Hyman wrote "randomization is often inadequate, multiple statistical testing without adjustment for significance levels is prevalent, possibilities for sensory leakage are not uniformly prevented, errors in use of statistical tests are much too common, and documentation is typically inadequate".[12] The parapsychologist Dean Radin has written the results from psi research are as consistent by the same standards as any other scientific discipline but according to Ray Hyman many parapsychologists such as Dick Bierman, Walter Lucadou, J.E. Kennedy, and Robert Jahn, openly admit the evidence for psi is "inconsistent, irreproducible, and fails to meet acceptable scientific standards".[13]
Basic physics leaves it not looking good for parapsychology as a field in any way. Sean Carroll points out[19] that both human brains and the spoons they try to bend are made, like all matter, of quarks and leptons; everything else they do is emergent properties of the behaviour of quarks and leptons. And the quarks and leptons interact through the four forces: strong, weak, electromagnetic and gravitational. Thus either it's one of the four known forces or it's a new force, and any new force with range over 1 millimetre must be at most a billionth the strength of gravity or it will have been captured in experiments already done.[20] So either it's electromagnetism, gravity or something weaker than gravity.
This leaves no force that could possibly account for telekinesis, for example. Telepathy would require a new force much weaker than gravity that is not subject to the inverse square law, and also a detector in the brain evolved to use it for signaling. Precognition, the receipt of information transmitted back in time, would violate quantum field theory.[21][22]
What this means is that these ideas have pretty much no chance of being right even before we test them directly.
G. A. Smith and Douglas Blackburn were endorsed as genuine psychics by the Society for Psychical Research but Blackburn later confessed to fraud:
Walter J. Levy who was the director of the Institute for Parapsychology was caught falsifying data. Levy confessed to tampering with a computerized apparatus to make it look like rats had psychokinetic abilities, and resigned his position.[28] H. N. Banjerjee director of the Seth Sohan Lal Memorial Institute of Parapsychology was also caught tampering with data.[29]
Dean Radin's parapsychology book The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena (2009) is known for containing many errors and promoting discredited experiments into psychic phenomena with poor controls as genuine scientific evidence for psi. Radin did not perform the file-drawer analysis correctly, made fundamental errors in his calculations and ignored possible, non-paranormal explanations for the data.[30] The book Randi's Prize: What Sceptics say about the Paranormal: Why they are Wrong and Why it Matters (2010) describes itself as a book documenting "the truth of the paranormal" and debunking the skeptics but contains lies on almost every page. The author Robert McLuhan even dedicates an entire chapter (over 40 pages) to the mediumship of Eusapia Palladino and concludes she was genuine, in reality she had been exposed in every country she was investigated in as using tricks which McLuhan does not mention. Similar deception occurs in the book Science and Psychic Phenomena: The Fall of the House of Skeptics (2012) by Chris Carter. In the book Carter ignores any data which contradicts the paranormal based on his personal belief.
The British psychiatrist Henry Maudsley in his book Natural Causes and Supernatural Seemings (1886) wrote that so called supernatural experiences could be explained in terms of disorders of the mind and were simply "malobservations and misinterpretations of nature".[32] Recent psychologists have explained in detail how reported phenomena such as mediumship, precognition, out-of body experiences and psychics can be explained by psychology without recourse to the supernatural.[33]
Researchers involved with anomalistic psychology try to provide plausible non-paranormal accounts, supported by empirical evidence, of how psychological and physical factors might combine to give the impression of paranormal activity when there had been none. Apart from deception or self-deception such explanations might involve cognitive biases, anomalous psychological states, dissociative states, hallucinations, personality factors, developmental issues and the nature of memory.[34] Most parapsychologists are very critical towards anomalistic psychology as they deny the paranomal can be explained by any naturalistic explanation and have written that paranormal phenomena (which they term psi) is real.
Parapsychologists have written that psychokinesis has been proven in scientific experiments with subjects influencing the output of a random number generator. In an investigation of 380 studies a group of scientists (Bösch et al, 2006) have written a meta-analysis on the subject. In their paper they wrote "statistical significance of the overall database provides no directive as to whether the phenomenon is genuine or not" and came to the conclusion that "publication bias appears to be the easiest and most encompassing explanation for the primary findings of the meta-analysis."[36] So contrary to what you might read in a parapsychology book, psychokinesis has not been scientifically proven.
Mention must also be made of Joseph B. Rhine, a professor at Duke University in the mid-20th century, who did extensive work on parapsychology and was responsible to a great degree for the field's sloppy protocol design. Rhine designed a special deck of cards containing five visually distinct shapes for use in telepathy and clairvoyance experiments, but also seemed blind to the consistent failure of experiments done under proper controls.
Allan Crossman suggests on LessWrong that parapsychology can serve as the control group for science itself:[37] a field using the methods of science but where the null hypothesis is always true. If they come up with positive results (as they occasionally do), this shows where the methods of science need improving.
This does have the philosophical problem that it would require dismissing out of hand any positive results, rather than properly evaluating them as merely ridiculously unlikely. Fortunately, this is unlikely to be a practical problem while well-designed tests show no positive results, and the only tests showing any positive results tend to exhibit the research design and analytical skills displayed in Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect.[38]
The wonderful world ofParapsychology |
![]() |
Strange powers |
Strange science |
Strange people |
The goal is to apply the rigors of the scientific method and the advancements learned in studying the human mind learned in psychology to the world of the paranormal. In practice most of the experiments are of very poor quality design. They use poor controls (if any at all), usually have small sample sizes, ill defined terms and procedures, and rarely apply the concepts of double-blind studies.
And remember, just because it's called parapsychology, it has nothing to do with psychology. Some critics of psychology don't understand that.
Contents[hide] |
[edit]Research
Parapsychologists study a number of paranormal phenomena, including:- Telepathy
- Precognition
- Clairvoyance
- Mediumship
- Psychokinesis
- Near-death experiences
- Reincarnation
- Apparitional experiences
[edit]Psi
Psi is the vague term for the phenomenon claimed to underpin parapsychology.[1] On the definition of psi, the psychologist James Alcock has written:“”Parapsychology is the only realm of objective inquiry in which the phenomena are all negatively defined, defined in terms of ruling out normal explanations. Of course, ruling out all normal explanations is not an easy task. We may not be aware of all possible normal explanations, or we may be deceived by our subjects, or we may deceive ourselves. If all normal explanations actually could be ruled out, just what is it that is at play? What is psi? Unfortunately, it is just a label. It has no substantive definition that goes beyond saying that all normal explanations have apparently been eliminated. Of course, parapsychologists generally presume that it has something to do with some ability of the mind to transcend the laws of nature as we know them, but all that is so vague as to be unhelpful in any scientific exploration.[2] |
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used in an effort to document the existence of psi. If psi exists, it occurs in the brain, and hence, assessing the brain directly should be more sensitive than using indirect behavioral methods (as have been used previously). To increase sensitivity, this experiment was designed to produce positive results if telepathy, clairvoyance (i.e., direct sensing of remote events), or precognition (i.e., knowing future events) exist. Moreover, the study included biologically or emotionally related participants (e.g., twins) and emotional stimuli in an effort to maximize experimental conditions that are purportedly conducive to psi. In spite of these characteristics of the study, psi stimuli and non-psi stimuli evoked indistinguishable neuronal responses-although differences in stimulus arousal values of the same stimuli had the expected effects on patterns of brain activation. These findings are the strongest evidence yet obtained against the existence of paranormal mental phenomena.[5] |
[edit]Practical scientific problems
Parapsychology is a pseudoscience. Sloppy practice is tolerated, verifiable positive results are perennially lacking,[6] the publication of negative results or disconfirmation of positive results is suppressed, parapsychologists who continue to get negative results get gently pushed out of the field,[6] and parapsychological hypotheses routinely contradict extremely well-understood and empirically verifiable science. The entire history of parapsychology has been scientifically unsuccessful. No experiment showing the existence of paranormal phenomena has been consistently replicated by scientists in other laboratories with the same results. According to the parapsychologist Gardner Murphy the failure of parapsychology is to "produce any truly repeatable experiment".[7]Parapsychologists such as Dean Radin and Charles Tart have written that psi is real, that it is non-physical in basis and that is does not operate by known scientific laws but despite this still claim that psi has been proven by science in repeatable experiments and refuse to classify psi as metaphysical. How can non-physical psi that does not operate by known scientific laws be tested by empirical science via physical experimentation and testing? This contradiction has been noted.
Most parapsychologists are in agreement that psi is non-physical but no accepted theory of parapsychology currently exists and many competing and often conflicting models have been advocated by different parapsychologists in an attempt to explain reported paranormal phenomena. On this issue, Terence Hines in his book Pseudoscience and the Paranormal (2003) wrote "Many theories have been proposed by parapsychologists to explain how psi takes place. To skeptics, such theory building seems premature, as the phenomena to be explained by the theories have yet to be demonstrated convincingly."[8]
The philosopher Raimo Tuomela summarized why much of parapsychology is considered a pseudoscience in his essay "Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience".[9]
- Parapsychology relies on an ill-defined ontology and typically shuns exact thinking.
- The hypotheses and theories of parapsychology have not been proven and are in bad shape.
- Extremely little progress has taken place in parapsychology on the whole and parapsychology conflicts with established science.
- Parapsychology has poor research problems, being concerned with establishing the existence of its subject matter and having practically no theories to create proper research problems.
- While in parts of parapsychology there are attempts to use the methods of science there are also unscientific areas; and in any case parapsychological research can at best qualify as prescientific becuase of its poor theoretical foundations.
- Parapsychology is a largely isolated research area.
In a review of parapsychological reports Ray Hyman wrote "randomization is often inadequate, multiple statistical testing without adjustment for significance levels is prevalent, possibilities for sensory leakage are not uniformly prevented, errors in use of statistical tests are much too common, and documentation is typically inadequate".[12] The parapsychologist Dean Radin has written the results from psi research are as consistent by the same standards as any other scientific discipline but according to Ray Hyman many parapsychologists such as Dick Bierman, Walter Lucadou, J.E. Kennedy, and Robert Jahn, openly admit the evidence for psi is "inconsistent, irreproducible, and fails to meet acceptable scientific standards".[13]
[edit]Criticisms
The psychologist Andrew Neher has written there are four key criticisms of parapsychology.[14]- The possibility that sensing of subtle sensory cues creates the appearance of psychic ability
- The possibility that favorable outcomes are a result of chance and coincidence
- The possibility of fraud
- The failure of many researchers to obtain results that support the psi hypothesis
- Psi phenomena have not been shown to exist.
- Psi may exist but are irrelevant to science, their nature being that they are not amenable to investigation by the scientific method.
- Psi hypotheses fail to qualify as science because they cannot be disproved.
- Parapsychology does not constitute a body of scientific knowledge, with a coherent rationale or framework but is merely a collection of anecdotal evidence.
[edit]Fundamental scientific problems
The big problem with parapsychology as a field is that science is all of a piece. Thus, physics is consistent with chemistry, biology and so on. So the question is not "what knowledge can we derive on the assumption that we know nothing?" but "what knowledge can we derive given what we know already?"Basic physics leaves it not looking good for parapsychology as a field in any way. Sean Carroll points out[19] that both human brains and the spoons they try to bend are made, like all matter, of quarks and leptons; everything else they do is emergent properties of the behaviour of quarks and leptons. And the quarks and leptons interact through the four forces: strong, weak, electromagnetic and gravitational. Thus either it's one of the four known forces or it's a new force, and any new force with range over 1 millimetre must be at most a billionth the strength of gravity or it will have been captured in experiments already done.[20] So either it's electromagnetism, gravity or something weaker than gravity.
This leaves no force that could possibly account for telekinesis, for example. Telepathy would require a new force much weaker than gravity that is not subject to the inverse square law, and also a detector in the brain evolved to use it for signaling. Precognition, the receipt of information transmitted back in time, would violate quantum field theory.[21][22]
What this means is that these ideas have pretty much no chance of being right even before we test them directly.
[edit]Deception
The field of parapsychology is filled with deception, fraud and tricks. Modern day books supportive of parapsychology are still promoting paranormal deception and lies. Parapsychology has a long history of fraud. The Creery Sisters (Mary, Alice, Maud, Kathleen, and Emily) were tested in 1881 by the psychical researchers William Barrett, Frederic Myers, and Edmund Gurney of the Society for Psychical Research and announced them to have genuine psychic ability however, during a test in 1888 they were caught utilizing signals codes and they confessed to fraud.[23][24] The psychical researcher Frederic William Henry Myers would sleep with the mediums he investigated to biasedly vote in their favor. The British parapsychologist S. G. Soal was charged with fraud as he had manipulated the data on the score sheets of his experiments.[25][26]G. A. Smith and Douglas Blackburn were endorsed as genuine psychics by the Society for Psychical Research but Blackburn later confessed to fraud:
“”For nearly thirty years the telepathic experiments conducted by Mr. G. A. Smith and myself have been accepted and cited as the basic evidence of the truth of thought transference... ...the whole of those alleged experiments were bogus, and originated in the honest desire of two youths to show how easily men of scientific mind and training could be deceived when seeking for evidence in support of a theory they were wishful to establish.[27] |
Dean Radin's parapsychology book The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena (2009) is known for containing many errors and promoting discredited experiments into psychic phenomena with poor controls as genuine scientific evidence for psi. Radin did not perform the file-drawer analysis correctly, made fundamental errors in his calculations and ignored possible, non-paranormal explanations for the data.[30] The book Randi's Prize: What Sceptics say about the Paranormal: Why they are Wrong and Why it Matters (2010) describes itself as a book documenting "the truth of the paranormal" and debunking the skeptics but contains lies on almost every page. The author Robert McLuhan even dedicates an entire chapter (over 40 pages) to the mediumship of Eusapia Palladino and concludes she was genuine, in reality she had been exposed in every country she was investigated in as using tricks which McLuhan does not mention. Similar deception occurs in the book Science and Psychic Phenomena: The Fall of the House of Skeptics (2012) by Chris Carter. In the book Carter ignores any data which contradicts the paranormal based on his personal belief.
[edit]Explanation
Not everything studied within parapsychology is the result of fraud or tricks. According to the scientific community paranormal phenomena have naturalistic explanations resulting from psychological and physical factors which have sometimes given the impression of paranormal activity to some people when, in fact, where there have been none.[31]The British psychiatrist Henry Maudsley in his book Natural Causes and Supernatural Seemings (1886) wrote that so called supernatural experiences could be explained in terms of disorders of the mind and were simply "malobservations and misinterpretations of nature".[32] Recent psychologists have explained in detail how reported phenomena such as mediumship, precognition, out-of body experiences and psychics can be explained by psychology without recourse to the supernatural.[33]
Researchers involved with anomalistic psychology try to provide plausible non-paranormal accounts, supported by empirical evidence, of how psychological and physical factors might combine to give the impression of paranormal activity when there had been none. Apart from deception or self-deception such explanations might involve cognitive biases, anomalous psychological states, dissociative states, hallucinations, personality factors, developmental issues and the nature of memory.[34] Most parapsychologists are very critical towards anomalistic psychology as they deny the paranomal can be explained by any naturalistic explanation and have written that paranormal phenomena (which they term psi) is real.
[edit]Psychokinesis
Martin Gardner has written that if psychokinesis existed then one would expect players to be able to influence the outcome of gambling games, however no effect has been observed. In Chicago a game called "26" has been played for decades in bars and cabarets and tally sheets year after year show the percentage of house take allowed by the laws of chance.[35]Parapsychologists have written that psychokinesis has been proven in scientific experiments with subjects influencing the output of a random number generator. In an investigation of 380 studies a group of scientists (Bösch et al, 2006) have written a meta-analysis on the subject. In their paper they wrote "statistical significance of the overall database provides no directive as to whether the phenomenon is genuine or not" and came to the conclusion that "publication bias appears to be the easiest and most encompassing explanation for the primary findings of the meta-analysis."[36] So contrary to what you might read in a parapsychology book, psychokinesis has not been scientifically proven.
[edit]Specific programs
The most famous example of bona fide parapsychology is probably the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab (PEAR). PEAR attempted to prove that human thought could manipulate the functioning of machines. They used devices designed to generate random phenomena, and then had subjects focus on disrupting that random pattern. They claimed to have shown that the experimental group of subjects focusing on disruption made the machine perform non-randomly in the direction the person was focusing. However, review of their procedures and data put that conclusion into serious doubt. All of the "effects" were witnessed by a single observer, who was a member of the lab. The PEAR group is no longer in operation.Mention must also be made of Joseph B. Rhine, a professor at Duke University in the mid-20th century, who did extensive work on parapsychology and was responsible to a great degree for the field's sloppy protocol design. Rhine designed a special deck of cards containing five visually distinct shapes for use in telepathy and clairvoyance experiments, but also seemed blind to the consistent failure of experiments done under proper controls.
[edit]Uses of parapsychology
Parapsychology provides useful teachable examples of ideas that can't possibly be right and how such wishful thinking persists well past mere physical impossibility.Allan Crossman suggests on LessWrong that parapsychology can serve as the control group for science itself:[37] a field using the methods of science but where the null hypothesis is always true. If they come up with positive results (as they occasionally do), this shows where the methods of science need improving.
This does have the philosophical problem that it would require dismissing out of hand any positive results, rather than properly evaluating them as merely ridiculously unlikely. Fortunately, this is unlikely to be a practical problem while well-designed tests show no positive results, and the only tests showing any positive results tend to exhibit the research design and analytical skills displayed in Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect.[38]
[edit]Notable parapsychologists
- Julia Assante
- Julie Beischel
- Stephen E. Braude
- Courtney Brown
- Piero Calvi-Parisetti
- Chris Carter
- David Fontana
- Alan Gauld
- Bruce Greyson
- George P. Hansen
- Brian Inglis
- Ervin László
- Robert McLuhan
- Frederic William Henry Myers
- Daniel Neiman
- Andrew Paquette
- Anthony Peake
- Guy Lyon Playfair
- Michael Prescott
- Dean Radin
- Tricia Robertson
- Michael Schmicker
- Gary Schwartz
- Rupert Sheldrake
- Ian Stevenson
- Michael Talbot
- Charles Tart
- Michael E. Tymn
- Gerhard D. Wassermann
- Craig Weiler
[edit]See also
[edit]External links
- Parapsychology in The Skeptic's Dictionary
- Susan Blackmore (a former parapsychology researcher turned skeptic) on parapsychology
- James Alcock. Back from the Future: Parapsychology and the Bem Affair.Skeptical Inquirer, Jan. 6 2011.
- James Alcock. (2003). Give the Null Hypothesis a Chance: Reasons to Remain Doubtful about the Existence of Psi. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10: 29–50.
- George Price. (1955). Science and the Supernatural. Science 122 (3165): 359–367.
[edit]Further reading
- Alcock, James. Parapsychology: Science or Magic?, 1981.
- Douglas, Alfred. Extra-sensory Powers: A Century of Psychical Research Overlook TP, 1995 ISBN 0879511605
- Gardner, Martin. Science: Good, Bad, and Bogus, 1981.
- Goran, Morris. Fact, Fraud and Fantasy: Occult and Pseudosciences Gazelle Book Services Ltd, 1980 ISBN 049802122X
- Hansel, C.E.M. (1989) The Search for Psychic Power: ESP and Parapsychology Revisited. Prometheus Books.
- Frazier, Kendrick (ed.) (1986) Science Confronts the Paranormal. Prometheus Books.
- Kurtz, Paul. A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology, 1985.
- Marks, David (2000) The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books.
- Milton, J. and Wiseman, R. (1999) Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin 125:387-391.
- Neher, Andrew. Paranormal and Transcendental Experience: A Psychological Examination Dover Publications; First Published Stated edition, 2011 ISBN 0486261670
- Smith, Jonathan. Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal: A Critical Thinker's Toolkit Wiley-Blackwell; 5 edition, 2009 ISBN 1405181222
- Wiseman, Richard. Paranormality: Why we see what isn't there Spin Solutions Ltd, 2011 ISBN 0956875653
[edit]Footnotes
- ↑Psi in The Skeptic's Dictionary
- ↑Give the Null Hypothesis a Chance by James Alcock
- ↑ See, e.g., physics, the James Randi $1 million challenge, etc.
- ↑ Ray Hyman. Evaluating Parapsychological Claims in Robert J. Sternberg, Henry L. Roediger, Diane F. Halpern. (2007). Critical Thinking in Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 216-231. ISBN 978-0521608343
- ↑ Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Using neuroimaging to resolve the psi debate. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 182-192.
- ↑ 6.06.1 Susan Blackmore. "The Elusive Open Mind: Ten Years of Negative Research in Parapsychology."The Skeptical Inquirer 1987, 11, 244-255.
- ↑ Neher, Andrew. Paranormal and Transcendental Experience: A Psychological Examination Dover Publications; First Published Stated edition, 2011 p. 148 ISBN 0486261670
- ↑ Terence Hines Pseudoscience and the Paranormal Prometheus Books; 2 Sub edition, 2003, p. 146 ISBN 1573929794
- ↑ Raimo Tuomela Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience pp. 83-102 in Joseph C. Pitt, Marcello Pera Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning Springer Netherlands, 1987 ISBN 9401081816
- ↑ James Alcock. (1981). Parapsychology: Science Or Magic?. Pergamon Press. p. 196
- ↑Skepdic Website
- ↑ Ray Hyman. (1988). Psi experiments: Do the best parapsychological experiments justify the claims for psi?. Experientia, 44, 315-322.
- ↑ Ray Hyman. (2008). Anomalous Cognition? A Second Perspective. Skeptical Inquirer. Volume 32.
- ↑ Neher, Andrew. Paranormal and Transcendental Experience: A Psychological Examination Dover Publications; First Published Stated edition, 2011 p. 140 ISBN 0486261670
- ↑ Stuart Holroyd Psi and the Consciousness Explosion The Bodley Head Ltd, 1977, pp. 126-127 ISBN 0370105036
- ↑ Taylor, J. G. & Balanovski, E. (1978). Can electromagnetism account for extra-sensory phenomena?. Nature 276, 64-67.
- ↑ Taylor, J. G. & Balanovski, E. (1979). Is there any scientific explanation of the paranormal?. Nature 279, 631-633.
- ↑The Elusive Open Mind: Ten Years of Negative Research in Parapsychology by Susan Blackmore
- ↑ Carroll, Sean M. "Telekinesis and Quantum Field Theory."Discover Blogs: Cosmic Variance 2008-02-18.
- ↑Life and the forces of nature (Sean M. Carroll, Preposterous Universe, 2004-05-03)
- ↑Physics FAQ (Scott I. Chase)
- ↑ Unless you warp spacetime sufficiently closely around a black hole or something.
- ↑ Ray Hyman. (1989). The Elusive Quarry: A Scientific Appraisal of Psychical Research. Prometheus Books. pp. 99-106
- ↑ Gordon Stein. (1996). The Encyclopedia of the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. p. 688
- ↑ Markwick, B. (1978). The Soal-Goldney experiments with Basil Shackleton: new evidence of data manipulation. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research 56: 250-280.
- ↑Soal-Goldney experiment
- ↑ Neher, Andrew. Paranormal and Transcendental Experience: A Psychological Examination Dover Publications; First Published Stated edition, 2011 p. 220 ISBN 0486261670
- ↑Walter J. Levy
- ↑ Neher, Andrew. Paranormal and Transcendental Experience: A Psychological Examination Dover Publications; First Published Stated edition, 2011 p. 144 ISBN 0486261670
- ↑ Victor Stenger. (2002). Meta-Analysis and the Filedrawer Effect. Skeptical Inquirer. Volume 12.
- ↑ Nicola Holt, Christine Simmonds-Moore, David Luke, Christopher French Anomalistic Psychology (Palgrave Insights in Psychology) Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 ISBN 0230301509
- ↑ Ivan Leudar, Philip Thomas Voices of Reason, Voices of Insanity: Studies of Verbal Hallucinations 2000, pp. 106-107
- ↑ Graham F. Reed The Psychology of Anomalous Experience: A Cognitive Approach Prometheus Books; Rev Sub edition, 1988 ISBN 0879754354
- ↑What is Anomalistic Psychology?
- ↑ Neher, Andrew. Paranormal and Transcendental Experience: A Psychological Examination Dover Publications; First Published Stated edition, 2011 p. 146 ISBN 0486261670
- ↑Examining Psychokinesis: The Interaction of Human Intention with Random Number Generators. A Meta-Analysis
- ↑ Allan Crossman. "Parapsychology: the control group for science."LessWrong 2009-12-05.
- ↑Understanding uncertainty: ESP and the significance of significance
↧
Curse
Curse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia/ Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
For other uses, see Curse (disambiguation).

A woman makes a cursing ritual ceremony, by Hokusai

Ancient Greek curse written on a lead sheet, 4th century BC, Kerameikos Archaeological Museum, Athens.
- African Americanhoodoo presents us with the jinx and crossed conditions, as well as a form of foot track magic which was used by Ramandeep, whereby cursed objects are laid in the paths of victims and activated when walked over.
- Middle Eastern and Mediterranean culture is the source of the belief in the evil eye, which may be the result of envy but, more rarely, is said to be the result of a deliberate curse. In order to be protected from the evil eye, a protection item is made from dark blue circular glass, with a circle of white around the black dot in the middle, which is reminiscent of a human eye. The size of the protective eye item may vary.
- German people, including the Pennsylvania Dutch speak in terms of hexing (from the German word for witchcraft), and a common hex in days past was that laid by a stable-witch who caused milk cows to go dry and horses to go lame.
Contents
[hide]Curse to the United States presidency[edit]
Tecumseh's curse was reputed to cause the deaths in office of Presidents of the United States elected in years divisible by 20, beginning in 1840. This alleged curse appears to have fallen dormant, since Ronald Reagan, (elected in 1980) survived an assassination attempt and George W. Bush (elected in 2000) survived his eight-year presidency.[edit]
Main article: Sports-related curses
A number of curses are used to explain the failures or misfortunes of specific sports teams, players, or even cities. For example:- No first-time winner of the World Snooker Championship has successfully defended his title since the event was first held at the Crucible Theatre in Sheffield in 1977. This has been widely attributed to a "Crucible Curse".
- The Curse of the Billy Goat is used to explain the failures of the Chicago Cubs baseball team, who have not won a World Series championship since 1908, and a National League pennant since 1945.
- There was a famous curse called the Curse of the Bambino on the Boston Red Sox Major League Baseball team. After the Red Sox sold Babe Ruth, who had won 3 of the 5 Red Sox World Series titles at the time, to the New York Yankees where he won his final 4 titles, it took the Red Sox 86 years to win another World Series (1918-2004). In 2004 the Red Sox made history in the American League Championship Series (ALCS) coming back from 0 games to 3, winning 4 games in a row against their arch rivals the New York Yankees blowing out game 7 in the Bronx 10 to 3, this is cited as one of the greatest comebacks in sports history. The Red Sox secured the AL Pennant and then went on to sweep the St. Louis Cardinals in the 2004 World Series, 4 games to 0 ending the curse once and for all. Three years later they would win sweep again in the 2007 World Series against the Colorado Rockies.
- The "Krukow Kurse" was used to explain the San Francisco Giants' failure to ever win the World Series until 2010. It is attributed to Mike Krukow (a former pitcher for the Giants and a current broadcaster for the team) based upon his yearly pre-season predictions that the Giants "have a chance" to win the World Series. Once Krukow stops making such predictions—says the legend—the Giants will, in fact, win the World Series. However, the Giants went on to win the World Series in 2010. Ironically, it was during the same year that Krukow's partner, Giants broadcaster, Duane Kuiper stated "Giants baseball, it's torture!", due to the large amount of close games that they played. This phrase was adopted by fans and became a rallying cry throughout the second half of the season and the playoff run.
- Marketing experts have highlighted "the curse of Gillette", given the mishaps that happen to sports stars associated with the brand.[4][5]
Cursed objects[edit]

Ancient Greek cursed object against enemies in a trial, written on a lead figurine put in a lead box, 420-410 BC, Kerameikos Archaeological Museum, Athens.
Egyptian curses and mummies[edit]

Limestone donation-stele from Mendes, 3rd Intermediate Period, Dynasty XXII. The inscription celebrates a donation of land to an Egyptian temple, and places a curse on anyone who would misuse or appropriate the land.
Biblical curses[edit]
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia article Cursing, the Bible depicts God cursing the serpent, the earth, and Cain (Genesis 3:14, 3:17, 4:11). Similarly Noah curses Canaan (Genesis 9:25), and Joshua curses the man who should build the city of Jericho (Joshua 6:26-27). In various books of the Old Testament there are long lists of curses against transgressors of the Law (Leviticus 26:14-25, Deuteronomy 27:15, etc.). So, too, in the New Testament, Christ curses the barren fig-tree (Mark 11:14), pronounces his denunciation of woe against the incredulous cities (Matthew 11:21), against the rich, the worldling, the scribes and the Pharisees, and foretells the awful malediction that is to come upon the damned (Matthew 25:41). The word curse is also applied to the victim of expiation for sin (Galatians 3:13), to sins temporal and eternal (Genesis 2:17; Matthew 25:41)."[6] Leaving Bethany the hungry rabbi Jesus cursed a fig tree that was barren (as it was not the season for figs). He said to the tree, “May no one ever eat fruit from you again.” Soon Saint Peter told him the tree had withered. (Mark 11:12-25).See also[edit]
- Book curse
- Curse of 39
- Curse of Turan
- Fortune telling fraud
- Nocebo
- Profanity
- Sports-related curses
- Superman curse
- Tecumseh's curse
References[edit]
- Jump up ^Chauran, Alexandra (2013). Have You Been Hexed? Recognizing and Breaking Curses. Llewellyn Worldwide. ISBN 0-7387-3620-1.
- Jump up ^Buddhaghosha (1870). Buddhaghosha's Parables: translated from Burmese by Captain T. Rogers: With an Introduction, containing Buddha's Dhammapada, or "Path of Virtue", translated from Pâli by F. Max Müller. Trübner. p. 22.
- Jump up ^Mesure, Susie (November 29, 2009). "Shaven but stirred: the Gillette curse". Tribune News (Tribune.ie). Retrieved 21 December 2010.
- Jump up ^Mesure, Susie (29 November 2009). "Henry, Woods, Federer: The curse of Gillette". The Independent (Independent.co.uk). Retrieved 21 December 2010.
- Jump up ^
"Cursing". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 1913.
Further reading[edit]
- Chauran, Alexandra (2013). Have You Been Hexed? Recognizing and Breaking Curses. Llewellyn Worldwide. ISBN 0-7387-3620-1.
- The Random House Dictionary, copyright 2009 by Random House, Inc.
- Curse tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World by John G. Gager ISBN 0-19-506226-4
- Maledicta: The International Journal of Verbal Aggression ISSN US 0363-3659
- Supernatural Hawaii by Margaret Stone. Copyright 1979 by Aloha Graphics and Sales. ISBN 0-941351-03-3
- The Secret Obake Casebook Tales from the Darkside of the Cabinet by Glen Grant. Copyright 1997 by Glen Grant. ISBN 1-56647-183-4
External links[edit]
![]() | Look up curse in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
![]() | Wikiquote has quotations related to: Curse |
- Rotten Library Article on Hexes
- [1] Curse Online-Test
|
↧
How to Perform Astral Projection
Astral projection refers to an out-of-body-experience (OBE) during which the astral body leaves the physical body and travels to the astral plane. People often experience this state during illness or when involved in a near death experience, but it is also possible to practice astral projection at will. This article contains instructions on how to get started. Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
Steps
Part 1 of 3: Preparing for astral projection
Create the right atmosphere. Astral projection requires a state of deep relaxation, so it should be performed in a part of your home where you're completely comfortable. Lie on your bed or sofa and relax your mind and body.
- It's easier to perform astral projection alone than it is with someone else in the room. If you usually sleep with a partner, choose a room other than the bedroom to practice astral projection.
- Draw the shades or curtains and rid the room of distracting noises. Any type of interruption could disrupt the state of relaxation you need to achieve.
Lie down and relax. Position yourself on your back in your chosen room. Close your eyes and try to clear your mind of distracting thoughts. Concentrate on your body and how it feels. The goal is to achieve a state of complete mind and body relaxation.
- Flex your muscles and then loosen them. Start with your toes and work your way up your body, gradually making your way to your head. Make sure every muscle is completely relaxed when you are through.
- Breathe deeply and exhale completely. Don't hold tension in your chest and shoulders, just relax.
- Focus your mind on your breathing. Don't get carried away with thoughts of outside worries, and don't get preoccupied yet with the idea of your soul projecting from your body. Just let yourself sink into relaxation.
Part 2 of 3: Moving the soul from the body
- Reach a hypnotic state. This hypnotic state is normally known as the hypnagogic state. Let your body and mind approach sleep, but don't completely lose consciousness. Being at the edge of wakefulness and sleep, a hypnotic state, is necessary for astral projection to occur. Reach this state using the following method:
- Keeping your eyes closed, let your mind wander to a part of your body, such as your hand, foot or a single toe.
- Focus on the body part until you can visualize it perfectly, even with your eyes closed. Continue focusing until all other thoughts fall away.
- Use your mind to flex your body part, but do not physically move it. Visualize your toes curling and uncurling, or your fingers clenching and unclenching, until it seems as though they are physically moving.
- Broaden your focus to the rest of your body. Move your legs, your arms, and your head using only your mind. Keep your focus steady until you're able to move your whole body in your mind alone.
- Enter into a state of vibration. Many report feeling vibrations, which come in waves at different frequencies, as the soul prepares to leave the body. Don't be afraid of the vibrations, since the presence of fear might cause you to leave your meditative state; instead, succumb to the vibrations as your soul prepares to leave your body.
- Use your mind to move your soul from your body. Imagine in your mind the room in which you are lying. Move your body in your mind to stand up. Look around yourself. Get up off the bed and walk across the room, then turn around and look at your body on the bed.
- Your OBE is successful if you feel as though you are gazing upon your body from across the room, and that your conscious self is now separate from your body.
- It takes a lot of practice to get to this point. If you have trouble completely lifting your soul from your body, try lifting just a hand or a leg at first. Keep practicing until you're able to move across the room.
- 4Return to your body. Your soul always remains connected to your body with an invisible force, sometimes referred to as a "silver cord." Let the force guide your soul back to your body. Reenter your body. Move your fingers and toes - physically, not just in your mind - and let yourself regain full consciousness.
Part 3 of 3: Exploring the astral plane
- 1Confirm that you are projecting your soul from your body. Once you have mastered the act of projecting your soul from your body in the same room, you will want to confirm that you were indeed in two separate planes.
- Next time you practice the astral projection, don't turn around to look at your body. Instead, leave the room and walk into another room in the house.
- Examine an object in the other room, something that you had never noticed before in the physical sense. Make a mental note of its color, shape and size, paying attention to as many details as possible.
- Return to your body. Physically go into the room you previously projected yourself into. Walk to the article you examined during the astral travel. Can you confirm the details you noted when you explored the object with your mind?
- Explore further. During subsequent astral projection sessions, go to locations that are less and less familiar to you. Each time, note details that you had never noticed before. After each session, physically verify the details. After a few trips, you will be experienced enough to travel to locations that are completely unfamiliar with the confidence that you have actually performed astral projection.
- Return to your body. Some say that astral projection is dangerous, especially when one gets enough practice to explore unfamiliar places. Before you astral project it is nice to imagine yourself bathed in a glowing, white light. Imagine it as a cloud around you, this will protect you from other thought forms. There is so much to get into, but know that no harm will come to you unless you think it will. The thrill of having an OBE keeps some people out of their bodies for long periods of time, which is said to weaken the silver cord. Be sure to stay aware of your body back at home while your soul is projected elsewhere.
- The silver cord can never be broken, but it is said that your soul can be delayed from reentering your body if you spend too much energy outside of it.
- Some say that demons can inhabit the body while the soul is being projected. If you fear this may happen, protect your body by blessing the room with a prayer before you perform projection.
- Your soul can also interact with other astral projections. Try it with a friend who has practiced as much as you have. Some say astral sex is mind blowing. However, remember to always return to your bod
Tips
- It's best not to be mentally or physically tired when attempting astral projection, as you will find it hard to concentrate. Drowsy morning feelings work better than being tired after a long day.
- Try not to be scared on your first time, or it will seem to become harder to go back to your body.
- Feel free to walk anywhere you would like. But do not go too far your first few times. If you are new to an astral plane, walk/fly to closer locations first.
- Beliefs play the largest part in Astral Projection. If you believe that you are going to be possessed, you may feel like you are possessed. If you feel like your "silver-cord" is "weak" and that you can't return, you will feel stuck. Feelings and thoughts are instantly manifested in the Astral Plane, anything you think/fear can seem to happen. Keep your thoughts positive. Don't try to Astral Project after watching a scary movie.
- If you feel it's hard to get back to your body, just imagine yourself striking with your body at the speed of light. You can come back from any place with in one second. Remember your soul is free of distance and time.
- When releasing your soul from your body, it can also help to imagine yourself all one dull color. Now imagine your colorful soul escaping from your body slowly.
- Visualize a white or yellowish light surrounding you while you Astral Project to protect yourself from bad entities who may suck your energy if you let them. Also, you can try to raise your vibrations.
- You cannot be hurt mentally/physically by something in the Astral Plane while having an OBE.
- Interactions while in the Astral Plane are limited
- Astral Projection can turn into whatever you want it to be It can also make your growth in anything spiritual raise quickly which is why you should not give up. Its pretty easy for what it can help you do in the future.
↧
Your entire life is an ILLUSION
New test backs up theory that the world doesn’t exist until we look at it
- Quantum mechanics states reality doesn't exist until it's measured
- This means a particle's past behaviour changes based on what we see
- Experiment using an atom and laser beams has proven this to be true
- How the atom behaved depended on how it was measured at end of test
This is according a famous theory in quantum mechanics which argues that a particle's past behaviour changes based on what we see.
Now, scientists have performed a new experiment proving this theory to be true on the scale of atoms.

The bizarre nature of reality as laid out by quantum theory has survived another test, with scientists performing a famous experiment and proving that reality does not exist until it is measured
According to the rules of quantum mechanics, the boundary between the 'world out there' and our own subjective consciousness are blurred.
When physicists look at atoms or particles of light, what they see depends on how they have set up their experiment.
To test this, physicists at the Australian National University recently conducted what is known as the John Wheeler's delayed-choice thought experiment.
The experiment involves a moving object that is given the choice to act like a particle or a wave.
Wheeler's experiment then asks - at which point does the object decide?
Common sense says the object is either wave-like or particle-like, independent of how we measure it.
But quantum physics predicts that whether you observe wave like behaviour or particle behaviour depends only on how it is actually measured at the end of its journey.
This is exactly what the Australian team found.
'It proves that measurement is everything. At the quantum level, reality does not exist if you are not looking at it,' said Associate Professor Andrew Truscott.
Despite the apparent weirdness, the results confirm the validity of quantum theory.
Quantum theory governs the world of the very small, and has enabled the development of many technologies such as LEDs, lasers and computer chips.
The ANU reversed Wheeler's original concept of light beams being bounced by mirrors, and instead used atoms scattered by laser light.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3107996/Our-entire-lives-ILLUSION-New-test-backs-theory-reality-doesn-t-exist-look-it.html#ixzz3c6TX5qeU
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
↧
↧
Barbara Brennan
Barbara Ann Brennan | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Occupation | Energy Healer, teacher, author |
Nationality | American |
Period | Late 20th Century – Early 21st Century |
Subject | Energy healing |
Notable works | Hands of Light |
Website | |
www |
Contents
[hide]Education and early career[edit]
Brennan received a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics in 1962 from the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and two years later received her Masters in Atmospheric Physics from the same institution.[3] From 1970, she participated in courses at a number of uncredited institutions, offering courses in the "human energy field". She completed a two–year program in Therapeutic Counselling at the Community of the Whole Person in Washington, D.C.,[citation needed] followed by a three-year program in Core Energetics at the Institute for Core Energetics in New York City in 1978 and a five-year program in Spiritual Healership at the Phoenicia Pathwork Center in Phoenicia, New York in 1979. She was strongly influenced by Eva and John Pierrakos, who founded a system for self-transformation called the Pathwork, drawing on the ideas of Wilhelm Reich and Alexander Lowen. Brennan worked with the Pierrakos, and became a Pathwork Helper and Core Energetics therapist.[4] Brennan also took seminars with and was influenced by Rev. Rosalyn L. Bruyere.[4] She developed her own private healing practice in 1977 and then established a training programme to teach others.[5][6] Brennan has a PhD in philosophy from Greenwich University in Australia and DTh in theology from Holos University, both earned in 2001.[7] These universities are unaccredited.[8]Ideas and theories[edit]
Her first book, Hands of Light: A Guide to Healing Through the Human Energy Field, is considered a "classic"[9] in the field of spiritual healing, with reputedly over one million copies in print in 22 languages. Brennan claims to receive intuitive information about her clients during sessions, and to see repetitive patterns in the energy fields of her clients indicating common roots underlying their difficulties.[6] Brennan's books contain drawings of auras and energy fields, and descriptions of how human energy fields interact with each other. She has popularized a seven-layer model of the energy field, each layer being structured of differing frequencies and kinds of energy and performing different functions.[10] Brennan views the chakras as transformers that receive and process universal energy, as well as enabling expression and healthy functioning of the individual's own consciousness and psycho-physical make-up. She is best known for taking a methodical approach to energy healing.[6]Brennan has created a type of energy healing techniques that she calls "full spectrum healing" to work on the seven layers of the human energy field or auras.[4] Brennan claims that the technique she calls spiritual surgery works on the fifth level of the human energy field using the power of a spirit surgeon.
Brennan's concept of hara[edit]
In her second book, Light Emerging, Brennan added, to her model of human subtle energies, the dimension of "intentionality" called hara . Hara holds the human body in material manifestation until the life purpose is fulfilled. When the hara is healthy, the individual acts naturally and effortlessly to fulfill his or her life purpose. The hara is the foundation for the human energy field (HEF), or aura. Because of this relationship, healing hara is considered especially powerful for healing the auric field and, thereby, the physical body.She also talks about the corestar. Our individual divinity, one with the universal divinity.[11]
Barbara Brennan School of Healing[edit]
In 1982, she closed her private practice in New York City and established the Barbara Brennan School of Healing, designed to train professional healers. The school is now located in Florida, and is licensed by the State of Florida Commission for Independent Education.[12] In 2003, Brennan opened the "Barbara Brennan School of Healing Europe", originally in Mondsee, Austria which then moved to Bad Neuenahr near Bonn, Germany in 2006 and moved back to Austria to the small town of Bad Ischl in 2008. In 2007, a new branch opened in Tokyo, Japan. The Barbara Brennan School of Healing is a nonaccredited school.[13]Publications[edit]
- Hands of Light: A Guide to Healing through the Human Energy Field, Bantam, 1987. ISBN 978-0-553-34539-1, limited free access
- Light Emerging: The Journey of Personal Healing, Bantam, 1993. ISBN 0-553-35456-6, limited free access
See also[edit]
- Terms and concepts in alternative medicine
- Body Psychotherapy
- Energy (esotericism)
- Energy medicine
- Bioenergetics
References[edit]
- Jump up ^Ankerberg, John; John Weldon (1996). Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs. Eugene, OR, USA: Harvest House Publishers. p. 493. ISBN 1-56507-160-3.
- Jump up ^Watkins Bookshop 100 most spiritually influential living people
- Jump up ^Angelo, Jean Marie (May–June 1993). "Healing Ourselves with Hands of Light". Yoga Journal (110): 73. Retrieved 10 February 2013.
- ^ Jump up to: abcBrennan, Barbara (1987). Hands of Light, Bantam Press at Random House, New York City. ISBN 0-553-34539-7
- Jump up ^Profile of Barbara Brennan by M. Alan Kazlev at the Wayback Machine (archived 20 February 2014)
- ^ Jump up to: abcGoldner, Diane (2003). How People Heal, Hampton Roads, Newburyport. ISBN 1-57174-363-4
- Jump up ^Brennan's Credentials
- Jump up ^List of unaccredited degree suppliers maintained by Oregon Office of Degree Authorization
- Jump up ^Boston Public Library
- Jump up ^Heart of Healing – Brennan’s Seven Layer Model
- Jump up ^Egli, Sandra R. (2002) A Study of Equivalence in Hara Assessments Using the Brennan Healing Science Model, Holos University, 2002
- Jump up ^Florida Department of Education Commission For Independent Education Annual Report 2009-2010
- Jump up ^Nonaccredited schools offering health-related instruction
External links[edit]
|
↧
Energy medicine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia/ Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
"Spiritual Healing" redirects here. For the album by the band Death, see Spiritual Healing (album).
Energy medicine- edit |
---|
|
NCCAM classifications |
See also |
Many schools of energy healing exist using many names, for example, biofield energy healing,[3][4]spiritual healing,[5]contact healing, distant healing, therapeutic touch,[6]Reiki[7] or Qigong.[3]
Spiritual healing occurs largely in non-denominational and ecumenical contexts. Practitioners do not see traditional religious faith as a prerequisite for effecting cures. Faith healing, by contrast, takes place within a traditional religious context.[8][verification needed]
While early reviews of the scientific literature on energy healing were equivocal and recommended further research,[9][10] more recent reviews have concluded that there is no evidence supporting clinical efficacy.[11][12][13][14][15][16] The theoretical basis of healing has been criticised as implausible,[17][18][19][20] research and reviews supportive of energy medicine have been faulted for containing methodological flaws[21][22][23] and selection bias,[21][22] and positive therapeutic results have been dismissed as resulting from known psychological mechanisms.[21][22]
Edzard Ernst, formerly Professor of Complementary and Alternative Medicine at the University of Exeter, has warned that "healing continues to be promoted despite the absence of biological plausibility or convincing clinical evidence ... that these methods work therapeutically and plenty to demonstrate that they do not".[13] Some claims of those purveying "energy medicine" devices are known to be fraudulent[24] and their marketing practices have drawn law-enforcement action in the U.S.[24]
Contents
[hide]History[edit]
There is a history of association or exploitation of scientific inventions by individuals claiming that newly discovered science could help people to heal: In the 19th century, electricity and magnetism were in the "borderlands" of science and electrical quackery was rife.[25] These concepts continue to inspire writers in the New Age movement.[26] In the early 20th century health claims for radio-active materials put lives at risk,[27] and recently quantum mechanics and grand unification theory have provided similar opportunities for commercial exploitation.[28] Thousands of devices claiming to heal via putative or veritable energy are used worldwide. Many of them are illegal or dangerous and are marketed with false or unproven claims.[24][29] Several of these devices have been banned.[30][31] Reliance on spiritual and energetic healings is associated with serious harm or death when medical treatment is delayed or foregone.[32] Various commentary points to an impairment in critical thinking.[32]Classification[edit]
The term "energy medicine" has been in general use since the founding of the non-profit International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine in the 1980s. Guides are available for practitioners, and other books aim to provide a theoretical basis and evidence for the practice. Energy medicine often proposes that imbalances in the body's "energy field" result in illness, and that by re-balancing the body's energy-field health can be restored.[33] Some modalities describe treatments as ridding the body of negative energies or blockages in 'mind'; illness or episodes of ill health after a treatment are referred to as a 'release' or letting go of a 'contraction' in the body-mind. Usually, a practitioner will then recommend further treatments for complete healing.The US-based National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) distinguishes between health care involving scientifically observable energy, which it calls "Veritable Energy Medicine", and health care methods that invoke physically undetectable or unverifiable "energies", which it calls "Putative Energy Medicine":[33]
- Types of "veritable energy medicine" include magnet therapy, colorpuncture, and light therapy. Medical techniques involving the use electromagnetic radiation (e.g.radiation therapy or magnetic resonance imaging) are not considered "energy medicine" in the terms of alternative medicine.
- Types of "putative energy medicine" include biofield energy healing therapies where the hands are used to direct or modulate "energies" which are believed to effect healing in the patient;[34][verification needed] this includes spiritual healing and psychic healing, Therapeutic touch, Healing Touch, Esoteric healing, Magnetic healing (now a historical term not to be confused with magnet therapy), Qigong healing, Reiki, Pranic healing, Crystal healing, distant healing, intercessory prayer, and similar modalities.[35][verification needed][36] Concepts such as Qi (Chi), Prana, Innate Intelligence, Mana, Pneuma, Vital fluid, Odic force, and Orgone are among the many terms that have been used to describe these putative energy fields.[35] This category does not include Acupuncture, Ayurvedic medicine, Chiropractic, and other modalities where a physical intervention is used to manipulate a putative energy.
Polarity therapy[edit]
Polarity therapy is a kind of energy medicine[37] based on the belief that a person's health is subject to positive and negative charges in their electromagnetic field.[38] It has been promoted as capable of curing a number of human ailments ranging from muscular tightness to cancer; however, according to the American Cancer Society"available scientific evidence does not support claims that polarity therapy is effective in treating cancer or any other disease".[38]Beliefs[edit]
Energy healing relies on a belief in the ability of a practitioner to channel healing energy into the person seeking help by different methods: hands-on,[1] hands-off,[1] and distant[1][2] (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations. The Brockhampton Guide to Spiritual Healing describes contact healing in terms of "transfer of ... healing energy" and distant healing based on visualising the patient in perfect health.[2] Practitioners say that this "healing energy" is sometimes perceived by the therapist as a feeling of heat.[1]There are various schools of energy healing, including biofield energy healing,[3][4]spiritual healing,[5]contact healing, distant healing, therapeutic touch,[6]Reiki,[7]Qigong, and many others.[3]
Spiritual healing is largely non-denominational; traditional religious faith is not seen as a prerequisite for effecting a cure. Faith healing, by contrast, takes place within a religious context.[8] The Buddha is often quoted by practitioners of energy medicine, but he did not practise "hands on or off" healing.[citation needed]
Energy healing techniques such as Therapeutic touch have found recognition in the nursing profession. In 2005-2006, the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association approved the diagnosis of "energy field disturbance" in patients, reflective of what has been variously called a "postmodern" or "anti-scientific" approach to nursing care. This approach has been strongly criticised.[39][40][41]
Believers in these techniques have proposed quantum mystical invocations of non-locality to try to explain distant healing.[18] They have also proposed that healers act as a channel passing on a kind of bioelectromagnetism which shares similarities to vitalisticpseudosciences such as orgone or qi.[19][20] Drew Leder remarked in a paper in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine that such ideas were attempts to "make sense of, interpret, and explore 'psi' and distant healing." and that "such physics-based models are not presented as explanatory but rather as suggestive."[42] Beverly Rubik, in an article in the same journal,[43] justified her belief with references to biophysical systems theory, bioelectromagnetics, and chaos theory that provide her with a "...scientific foundation for the biofield..." Writing in the Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, James Oschman[44] introduced the concept of healer-sourced electromagnetic fields which change in frequency. Oschman believes that "healing energy" derives from electromagnetic frequencies generated by a medical device, projected from the hands of the healer, or by electrons acting as antioxidants.[45]
Physicists and skeptics roundly criticize these explanations as pseudophysics — a branch of pseudoscience which explains magical thinking by using irrelevant jargon from modern physics to exploit scientific illiteracy and to impress the unsophisticated.[17] Indeed, even enthusiastic supporters of energy healing point out that "there are only very tenuous theoretical foundations underlying healing."[36]
Scientific investigations[edit]
Distant healing[edit]
A systematic review of 23 trials of distant healing published in 2000 did not draw definitive conclusions because of the "methodologic limitations of several studies".[9] In 2001 the lead author of that study, Edzard Ernst, published a primer on complementary therapies in cancer care in which he explained that though "about half of these trials suggested that healing is effective" he cautioned that the evidence was "highly conflicting" and that "methodological shortcomings prevented firm conclusions." He concluded that "as long as it is not used as an alternative to effective therapies, spiritual healing should be virtually devoid of risks."[10] A 2001 randomized clinical trial by the same group found no statistically significant difference on chronic pain between distance healers and "simulated healers".[11] A 2003 review by Ernst updating previous work concluded that more recent research had shifted the weight of evidence "against the notion that distant healing is more than a placebo" and that "distant healing can be associated with adverse effects."[46]Contact healing[edit]
A 2001 randomized clinical trial randomly assigned 120 patients with chronic pain to either healers or "simulated healers", but could not demonstrate efficacy for either distance or face-to-face healing.[11] A Cochrane collaboration systematic review[16] of the use of touch therapies published in 2008 analysed the results of 24 trials and concluded that the attempted review suffered from "a major limitation: the small number of studies and insufficient data. As a result of inadequate data, the effects of touch therapies cannot be clearly declared." A systematic review in 2008 concluded that the evidence for a specific effect of spiritual healing on relieving neuropathic or neuralgic pain was not convincing.[14] In their 2008 book Trick or Treatment, Simon Singh and Edzard Ernst concluded that "spiritual healing is biologically implausible and its effects rely on a placebo response. At best it may offer comfort; at worst it can result in charlatans taking money from patients with serious conditions who require urgent conventional medicine."[15]Evidence base[edit]
Alternative medicine researcher Edzard Ernst has argued that although an initial review of pre-1999 distant healing trials[9] had highlighted 57% of trials as showing positive results,[10] later reviews of non-randomised and randomised clinical trials conducted between 2000 and 2002[46] led to the conclusion that "the majority of the rigorous trials do not support the hypothesis that distant healing has specific therapeutic effects". Ernst described the evidence base for healing practices to be "increasingly negative".[13] Ernst also warned that many of the reviews were under suspicion for fabricated data, lack of transparency, and scientific misconduct. He concluded that "[s]piritual healing continues to be promoted despite the absence of biological plausibility or convincing clinical evidence ... that these methods work therapeutically and plenty to demonstrate that they do not."[13] A 2014 study of energy healing for colorectal cancer patients showed no improvement in quality of life, depressive symptoms, mood, or sleep quality.[47]Alternative explanations for positive reports[edit]
There are several, primarily psychological, explanations for positive reports after energy therapy, including placebo effects, spontaneous remission, and cognitive dissonance. A 2009 review found that the "small successes" reported for two therapies collectively marketed as "energy psychology" (Emotional Freedom Techniques and Tapas Acupressure Technique) "are potentially attributable to well-known cognitive and behavioral techniques that are included with the energy manipulation." The report concluded that "[p]sychologists and researchers should be wary of using such techniques, and make efforts to inform the public about the ill effects of therapies that advertise miraculous claims."[21]There are primarily two explanations for anecdotes of cures or improvements, relieving any need to appeal to the supernatural.[48] The first is post hoc ergo propter hoc, meaning that a genuine improvement or spontaneous remission may have been experienced coincidental with but independent from anything the healer or patient did or said. These patients would have improved just as well even had they done nothing. The second is the placebo effect, through which a person may experience genuine pain relief and other symptomatic alleviation. In this case, the patient genuinely has been helped by the healer – not through any mysterious or numinous function, but by the power of their own belief that they would be healed.[49][50] In both cases the patient may experience a real reduction in symptoms, though in neither case has anything miraculous or inexplicable occurred. Both cases, are strictly limited to the body's natural abilities.
Positive findings from research studies can also result from such psychological mechanisms, or as a result of experimenter bias, methodological flaws such as lack of blinding,[21] or publication bias; positive reviews of the scientific literature may show selection bias, in that they omit key studies that do not agree with the author's position.[21][22] All of these factors must be considered when evaluating claims.
See also[edit]
- Alternative medicine
- Bioelectromagnetics
- Electrotherapy
- Energy field disturbance
- Faith healing
- Hologram bracelet
- List of branches of alternative medicine
- List of ineffective cancer treatments
- List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
- Magnet therapy
- Prayer
- Reiki
- Radionics
- The Sunflower Jam
- Zero Balancing
- Fraudulent Mediums Act 1951
- Witchcraft Acts
References[edit]
- ^ Jump up to: abcdefgJules Evans (July 14, 2008). "Spiritual healing on the NHS?". London: The Times.
- ^ Jump up to: abcDaulby, Martin; Mathison, Caroline (1996). Guide to Spiritual Healing. Brockhampton Press. p. 89. ISBN 1-86019-370-6.
- ^ Jump up to: abcdNetwork newsletter, MD Anderson Cancer Center (2007). "Energy Medicines: Will East Meet West?".
- ^ Jump up to: ab"Biofield Therapies: Helpful or Full of Hype?". International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (Volume 17, Number 1, 1-16). October 2007. doi:10.1007/s12529-009-9062-4.
- ^ Jump up to: abEdzard Ernst (2001). "A primer of complementary and alternative medicine commonly used by cancer patients". Medical Journal of Australia (174): 88–92.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"Therapeutic Touch". Cancer.org. 2008-06-02. Retrieved 2010-09-20.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"Reiki Practice". Nccih.nih.gov. Retrieved 2010-09-20.
- ^ Jump up to: abWhat is healing? ("The Healing Trust).
- ^ Jump up to: abcAstin, J.; et. al (2000). "The Efficacy of "Distant Healing: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials". Annals of Internal Medicine132 (11): 903–910. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00009. PMID 10836918.
- ^ Jump up to: abcErnst, Edzard (2001). "A primer of complementary and alternative medicine commonly used by cancer patients". Medical Journal of Australia174 (2): 88–92. PMID 11245510.
- ^ Jump up to: abcAbbot, NC; Harkness, EF; Stevinson, C; Marshall, FP; Conn, DA; Ernst, E (2001). "Spiritual healing as a therapy for chronic pain: a randomized, clinical trial". Pain91 (1–2): 79–89. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00421-8. PMID 11240080.
- Jump up ^Ernst E. (2003-04-30). "Distant healing—an update of a systematic review". Wien Klin. Wochenschr.115 (7–8): 241–245. doi:10.1007/BF03040322. PMID 12778776.
Since the publication of our previous systematic review in 2000, several rigorous new studies have emerged. Collectively they shift the weight of the evidence against the notion that distant healing is more than a placebo.
- ^ Jump up to: abcdErnst E. (Nov 2006). "Spiritual healing: more than meets the eye". J Pain Symptom Manage.32 (5): 393–5. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.07.010. PMID 17085260.
- ^ Jump up to: abPittler, MH; Ernst, E (2008). "Complementary Therapies for Neuropathic and Neuralgic Pain: Systematic Review". Clinical Journal of Pain.24 (8): 731–733. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181759231. PMID 18806539.
- ^ Jump up to: abTrick or Treatment. Corgi. 2008. p. 388.
- ^ Jump up to: abSo PS, Jiang Y, Qin Y (2008). So, Pui Shan, ed. "Touch therapies for pain relief in adults". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) (4): CD006535. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006535.pub2. PMID 18843720.
- ^ Jump up to: abRichard Gist, Bernard Lubin (1999). Response to disaster: psychosocial, community, and ecological approaches in clinical and community psychology. Psychology Press. p. 291. ISBN 0-87630-998-8.
- ^ Jump up to: abStephen Barrett. "Some Notes on the American Academy of Quantum Medicine (AAQM)".
- ^ Jump up to: abStenger, Victor J. (1999). "The Physics of 'Alternative Medicine': Bioenergetic Fields". The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine3 (1): 16–21.
- ^ Jump up to: abEduard Kruglyakov (2004-09-30). "What threat does pseudoscience pose to society?". Social Sciences3 (3): 74–88.
- ^ Jump up to: abcdefMcCaslin DL (June 2009). "A review of efficacy claims in energy psychology". Psychotherapy (Chicago)46 (2): 249–56. doi:10.1037/a0016025. PMID 22122622.
- ^ Jump up to: abcdPignotti, M. and Thyer, B. (2009). "Some comments on "Energy psychology: A review of the evidence": Premature conclusions based on incomplete evidence?". Psychotherapy: Research, Practice, Training46 (2): 257–261. doi:10.1037/a0016027. PMID 22122623.
- Jump up ^Agdal, R; von b Hjelmborg, J; Johannessen, H (2011). "Energy healing for cancer: A critical review". Forschende Komplementärmedizin / Research in Complementary Medicine18 (3): 146–54. doi:10.1159/000329316. PMID 21701183.
- ^ Jump up to: abcMichael J. Berens and Christine Willmsen. "Miracle Machines:The 21st-Century Snake Oil". Seattle Times. Retrieved 2007-11-18.
- Jump up ^Jonas, WB; Crawford, CC (Mar–April 2003). "Science and spiritual healing: a critical review of spiritual healing, "energy" medicine, and intentionality". Altern-Ther-Health-Med.9 (2): 56–61. PMID 12652884.Check date values in:
|date=
(help) - Jump up ^Bruce Clarke. (November 8, 2001). Energy Forms: Allegory and Science in the Era of Classical Thermodynamics. University of Michigan Press. p. Clarke, Bruce. ISBN 0-472-11174-4.
- Jump up ^Gray, Theodore (August 2004). "For That Healthy Glow, Drink Radiation!". Popular Science (Bonnier Corporation) 265 (2): 28. ISSN 0161-7370.
- Jump up ^Athearn, D. (1994). Scientific Nihilism: On the Loss and Recovery of Physical Explanation (SUNY Series in Philosophy). Albany, New York: State University Of New York Press.
- Jump up ^"Miracle Makers or Money Takers?". CBC News: Marketplace.
- Jump up ^Michael J. Berens and Christine Willmsen (2008-01-30). "Fraudulent medical devices targeted". Seattle Times. Retrieved 2008-01-30.
- Jump up ^CBC Marketplace. "Is the EPFX still allowed to be sold in Canada?". CBC. Retrieved 2009-02-27.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"What_is_this_site?".
- ^ Jump up to: abNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2005). "Energy Medicine: An Overview".
- Jump up ^Warber, S. L., Straughn, J., Kile, G. (December 2004). "Biofield Energy Healing from the Inside". The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine10 (6): 1107–1113. doi:10.1089/acm.2004.10.1107. PMID 15674009.
- ^ Jump up to: abBenor, Daniel J. Spiritual Healing: Scientific Validation of a Healing Revolution (Wholistic Healing Publications, 2006) pp. 139-149.
- ^ Jump up to: abHodges, RD and Scofield, AM (1995). "Is spiritual healing a valid and effective therapy?". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine88 (4): 203–207. PMC 1295164. PMID 7745566.
- Jump up ^"Polarity Therapy". Wellness Institute. Retrieved September 2013.
- ^ Jump up to: ab"Polarity Therapy". American Cancer Society. November 2008. Retrieved 22 September 2013.
- Jump up ^Sarah Glazer (2000). "Postmodern nursing". National Affairs.
- Jump up ^Hammer, Owen; James Underdown (November–December 2009). "State-Sponsored Quackery: Feng Shui and Snake Oil for California Nurses". Skeptical Inquirer (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry) 33 (6): 53–56.
- Jump up ^Junkfood Science Special: Trusting nurses with our lives by Sandy Szwarc, BSN, RN, CCP. July 6, 2007.
- Jump up ^Leder, D (2005). ""Spooky actions at a distance": physics, psi, and distant healing". Journal of alternative and complementary medicine11 (5): 923–30. doi:10.1089/acm.2005.11.923. PMID 16296928.
- Jump up ^Rubik, Beverly (2002). "The Biofield Hypothesis: Its Biophysical Basis and Role in Medicine". Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine8 (6): 714. doi:10.1089/10755530260511711.
- Jump up ^Oschman, James L. (1997). "What is healing energy? Part 3: silent pulses". Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies1 (3): 179. doi:10.1016/S1360-8592(97)80038-1.
- Jump up ^Oschman, James (November 9, 2007). "Can Electrons Act as Antioxidants? A Review and Commentary". The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine13 (9): 955–967. doi:10.1089/acm.2007.7048.
- ^ Jump up to: abErnst E. (2003). "Distant healing—an update of a systematic review". Wien Klin Wochenschr.115 (7–8): 241–245. doi:10.1007/BF03040322. PMID 12778776.
- Jump up ^CG Pedersen, H Johannessen, JV Hjelmborg, R Zachariae (June 2014). "Effectiveness of energy healing on Quality of Life: a pragmatic intervention trial in colorectal cancer patients". Complementary Therapies in Medicine22 (3): 463–72. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2014.04.003. PMID 24906586.
- Jump up ^"Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Cancer Patients: Faith Healing". Moores UCSD Cancer Center. Retrieved 2008-01-17."Benefits may result because of the natural progression of the illness, rarely but regularly occurring spontaneous remission or through the placebo effect."
- Jump up ^Park, Robert L. (2000). Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0-19-513515-6.
- Jump up ^"Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Cancer Patients: Faith Healing". Moores UCSD Cancer Center. Retrieved 2008-01-17."Patients who seek the assistance of a faith healer must believe strongly in the healer’s divine gifts and ability to focus them on the ill."
External links[edit]
- NIH Energy medicine: overview.
- Miracle Machines: The 21st-Century Snake Oil: a Seattle Times series on fraudulent energy medicine devices
- What Is Complementary and Alternative Medicine? Other CAM Practices"biofield".
↧
Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia/ Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science
The Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness (commonly referred to as the ASSC) is a professional membership organization that aims to encourage research on consciousness in cognitive science, neuroscience, philosophy, and other relevant disciplines in the sciences and humanities, directed toward understanding the nature, function, and underlying mechanisms of consciousness. The organization was created in 1994 in Berkeley immediately after the first Tucson meeting by Patrick Wilken. The original aim of the organization was to act as a framework by which the international academic community could generate meetings devoted to the academic study of consciousness. The original founding members included Bernard Baars, William Banks, David Chalmers, Stanley Klein, George Buckner, David Rosenthal, Thomas Metzinger and Patrick Wilken. Since 1994 the organization has put on eleven meetings and taken on a host of other activities, including an e-print archive and the online journal Psyche.
In 2008 the executive committee of the association was composed as follows: Michael Gazzaniga (Past-President), David Rosenthal (President), Giulio Tononi (President-Elect); and six Members-at-Large, Christof Koch, Alva Noë, Susana Martinez-Conde, Paula Droege, and John-Dylan Haynes. In 2007 Christof Koch took over as Director and Chair of the Board from Patrick Wilken.
In addition to organizing annual meetings, the association promotes the academic study of consciousness in a number of other ways:
In 2008 the executive committee of the association was composed as follows: Michael Gazzaniga (Past-President), David Rosenthal (President), Giulio Tononi (President-Elect); and six Members-at-Large, Christof Koch, Alva Noë, Susana Martinez-Conde, Paula Droege, and John-Dylan Haynes. In 2007 Christof Koch took over as Director and Chair of the Board from Patrick Wilken.
Activities[edit]
Since 1997, the ASSC has organised annual conferences to promote interaction and spread knowledge of scientific and philosophical advances in the field of consciousness research. The 2008 meeting was organized by Allen Houng and Ralph Adolphs, and held between the 19th and 22nd of June at the Gis Convention Center, National Taiwan University in Taipei. The June 2009 meeting was held in Berlin, and organized by Patrick Wilken and Michael Pauen.In addition to organizing annual meetings, the association promotes the academic study of consciousness in a number of other ways:
- The official journal of the society is the open-access journal Neuroscience of Consciousness.[1]
- The association published the open-access journal Psyche until 2010.
- The association provides a freely available e-print archive of papers relevant to the study of consciousness.
- the society also publishes occasional edited books on selected topics. To date three books have been published: Steven Laureys, ed. (2005). Progress in Brain Research, The boundaries of consciousness: neurobiology and neuropathology. Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-51851-7.; Axel Cleeremans (Ed.), ed. (2003). The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration, and Dissociation. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-850857-3.; and Thomas Metzinger, ed. (2000). The Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-13370-9.;
- the society awards the annual William James Prize for an outstanding published contribution to the empirical or philosophical study of consciousness by a graduate student or postdoctoral scholar within five years of receiving a PhD or other advanced degree.
References[edit]
- Jump up ^"Neuroscience of Consciousness". http://nc.oxfordjournals.org/. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 27 January 2015.
External links[edit]
↧
They discussed this too. One said that sleep paralysis involves lucidity and should therefore be higher up than dreaming, others said that sleep paralysis and lucid dreaming shouldn’t be on opposite sides of dreaming or should be closer together because each can cause each other. Others discussed how different drugs are more or less similar to others or are ‘higher’ and ‘lower’.
And this is the point. Those of us who explore many states of consciousness have the intuition that some states are similar to others while some are very different – that some are easy to reach from other states while some are not. But is this intuition sound? And what does it mean?
It would be fantastic to have such a map and be able to use it, but we don’t. That’s why my diagram just had arrows for the three axes. It was drawn by my son Jolyon Troscianko who has illustrated many of my books, and it was deliberately vague. So will we ever have such a map?
Many people have tried to make them, as I outlined in my textbook on consciousness. For example, psychologist Charles Tart mapped dreaming and other states using as axes ‘ability to hallucinate’ and ‘rationality’; neurologist Steven Laureys used ‘level of consciousness’ and ‘content of consciousness’; and sleep expert, J. Allan Hobson developed a 3D ‘AIM model’ with the dimensions being ‘activation’, ‘input-output gating’ and ‘modulation’. All these were based on scientific research. For example Hobson’s is based on based on the effects of different neurotransmitters. But there are plenty more based on shamanic states, spiritual doctrines, meditation methods or various theories of consciousness.
This conversation is great fun, and after meandering around wild speculations ends up with the truth. The axes are purely imaginary. I had no specific dimensions in mind when I asked Jolyon to draw it and to put arrows for the imagined axes. The drawing is just meant to illustrate the idea that there might be a vast multi-dimensional space of states of consciousness – with some being close to each other and others far apart. One day someone will create a real map. For now we have to guess. If you want to know more there are more of Jolyon’s drawings and a review of real attempts to map states of consciousness in my textbook Consciousness: An Introduction.